Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IMCG vs PJFM
IMCG vs PJFM Comparison
Open Charts IMCG vs PJFM
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$77.54
Change+$0.02 (+0.03%)
Volume$262.07K
Net Assets2.7B
PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF
Price$56.85
Change-$0.03 (-0.05%)
Volume$473
Net Assets13.65M
IMCG vs PJFM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IMCG vs. PJFM commentary
Jun 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMCG is a Hold and PJFM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMCG has more net assets: 2.7B vs. PJFM (13.7M). IMCG has a higher annual dividend yield than PJFM: IMCG (3.013) vs PJFM (-2.110). IMCG was incepted earlier than PJFM: IMCG (21 years) vs PJFM (2 years). IMCG (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than PJFM (0.49). PJFM has a higher turnover IMCG (43.00) vs IMCG (43.00).
| IMCG | PJFM | IMCG / PJFM | |
| Gain YTD | 3.013 | -2.110 | -143% |
| Net Assets | 2.7B | 13.7M | 19,679% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.06 | 0.49 | 12% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 101.00 | 43% |
| Yield | 0.75 | 0.84 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IMCG | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IMCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCG has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCG jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCG | 100% | +0.03% | ||
| FTV - IMCG | 82% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| ARES - IMCG | 82% Closely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| JEF - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| HLT - IMCG | 80% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| OWL - IMCG | 79% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
More | ||||
PJFM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PJFM has been loosely correlated with KEX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PJFM jumps, then KEX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PJFM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PJFM | 100% | -0.06% | ||
| KEX - PJFM | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| WTFC - PJFM | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.42% | ||
| PNFP - PJFM | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.33% | ||
| WSC - PJFM | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| ALSN - PJFM | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.54% | ||
More | ||||