Ad is loading...
IMCG vs RFG
IMCG vs RFG Comparison
Open Charts IMCG vs RFG
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$74.39
Change-$0.05 (-0.07%)
Volume$120
Net Assets2.51B
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF
Price$46.25
Change+$0.50 (+1.09%)
Volume$156.67K
Net Assets279.57M
IMCG vs RFG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IMCG vs. RFG commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMCG is a Buy and RFG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMCG has more net assets: 2.51B vs. RFG (280M). IMCG has a higher annual dividend yield than RFG: IMCG (-1.279) vs RFG (-4.407). IMCG was incepted earlier than RFG: IMCG (21 years) vs RFG (19 years). IMCG (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than RFG (0.35). RFG has a higher turnover IMCG (43.00) vs IMCG (43.00).
| IMCG | RFG | IMCG / RFG | |
| Gain YTD | -1.279 | -4.407 | 29% |
| Net Assets | 2.51B | 280M | 898% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.06 | 0.35 | 17% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 89.00 | 48% |
| Yield | 0.80 | 0.33 | 241% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IMCG | RFG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IMCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCG has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCG jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCG | 100% | +1.24% | ||
| FTV - IMCG | 82% Closely correlated | +2.65% | ||
| ARES - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | +2.33% | ||
| JEF - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | +3.34% | ||
| HLT - IMCG | 78% Closely correlated | +0.63% | ||
| OWL - IMCG | 77% Closely correlated | +2.49% | ||
More | ||||
RFG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RFG has been closely correlated with HLNE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RFG jumps, then HLNE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RFG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RFG | 100% | +1.09% | ||
| HLNE - RFG | 81% Closely correlated | +2.57% | ||
| AIT - RFG | 81% Closely correlated | +2.84% | ||
| NVT - RFG | 79% Closely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| GTLS - RFG | 79% Closely correlated | +4.43% | ||
| KEX - RFG | 79% Closely correlated | +1.65% | ||
More | ||||