Ad is loading...
IMCG vs RFG
IMCG vs RFG Comparison
Open Charts IMCG vs RFG
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$68.20
Change+$0.39 (+0.58%)
Volume$174.86K
Net Assets2.34B
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF
Price$42.14
Change+$0.28 (+0.67%)
Volume$17.37K
Net Assets257.37M
IMCG vs RFG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IMCG vs. RFG commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMCG is a Hold and RFG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMCG has more net assets: 2.34B vs. RFG (257M). IMCG has a higher annual dividend yield than RFG: IMCG (-9.554) vs RFG (-12.894). IMCG was incepted earlier than RFG: IMCG (21 years) vs RFG (19 years). IMCG (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than RFG (0.35). RFG has a higher turnover IMCG (43.00) vs IMCG (43.00).
| IMCG | RFG | IMCG / RFG | |
| Gain YTD | -9.554 | -12.894 | 74% |
| Net Assets | 2.34B | 257M | 909% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.06 | 0.35 | 17% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 89.00 | 48% |
| Yield | 0.81 | 0.34 | 241% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IMCG | RFG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 81% | 11 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IMCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCG has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCG jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCG | 100% | +0.58% | ||
| FTV - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| ARES - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| JEF - IMCG | 79% Closely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| HLT - IMCG | 76% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| OWL - IMCG | 76% Closely correlated | +1.81% | ||
More | ||||