Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IMCG vs RFG
IMCG vs RFG Comparison
Open Charts IMCG vs RFG
IMCG vs RFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IMCG vs. RFG commentary
Jul 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMCG is a Hold and RFG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMCG has more net assets: 3.92B vs. RFG (348M). IMCG has a higher annual dividend yield than RFG: IMCG (19.424) vs RFG (15.604). IMCG was incepted earlier than RFG: IMCG (22 years) vs RFG (20 years). IMCG (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than RFG (0.35). RFG has a higher turnover IMCG (45.00) vs IMCG (45.00).
| IMCG | RFG | IMCG / RFG | |
| Gain YTD | 19.424 | 15.604 | 124% |
| Net Assets | 3.92B | 348M | 1,127% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.06 | 0.35 | 17% |
| Turnover | 45.00 | 77.00 | 58% |
| Yield | 0.61 | 0.14 | 443% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IMCG | RFG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 27 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 7 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IMCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCG has been closely correlated with ROK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCG jumps, then ROK could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCG | 100% | -0.29% | ||
| ROK - IMCG | 72% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| CMI - IMCG | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.06% | ||
| RRX - IMCG | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| KEYS - IMCG | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.99% | ||
| AME - IMCG | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.34% | ||
More | ||||
RFG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RFG has been closely correlated with ONTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RFG jumps, then ONTO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y