Ad is loading...
IMCG vs VOT
IMCG vs VOT Comparison
Open Charts IMCG vs VOT
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$68.88
Change-$3.94 (-5.41%)
Volume$156.97K
Net Assets2.54B
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$235.35
Change-$13.55 (-5.44%)
Volume$300.65K
Net Assets28.72B
IMCG vs VOT Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IMCG vs. VOT commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMCG is a Hold and VOT is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VOT has more net assets: 28.7B vs. IMCG (2.54B). VOT has a higher annual dividend yield than IMCG: VOT (-7.225) vs IMCG (-8.652). IMCG was incepted earlier than VOT: IMCG (21 years) vs VOT (19 years). IMCG (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than VOT (0.07). IMCG has a higher turnover VOT (14.00) vs VOT (14.00).
| IMCG | VOT | IMCG / VOT | |
| Gain YTD | -8.652 | -7.225 | 120% |
| Net Assets | 2.54B | 28.7B | 9% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.06 | 0.07 | 86% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 14.00 | 307% |
| Yield | 0.81 | 0.71 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IMCG | VOT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 81% | 8 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IMCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCG has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCG jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCG | 100% | -5.41% | ||
| FTV - IMCG | 77% Closely correlated | -8.98% | ||
| ARES - IMCG | 76% Closely correlated | -15.48% | ||
| ENTG - IMCG | 73% Closely correlated | -16.17% | ||
| HUBB - IMCG | 72% Closely correlated | -5.93% | ||
| URI - IMCG | 72% Closely correlated | -8.51% | ||
More | ||||
VOT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VOT has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VOT jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VOT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VOT | 100% | -5.44% | ||
| ARES - VOT | 75% Closely correlated | -15.48% | ||
| XPO - VOT | 75% Closely correlated | -13.75% | ||
| APO - VOT | 73% Closely correlated | -12.77% | ||
| RVTY - VOT | 72% Closely correlated | -5.59% | ||
| CZR - VOT | 71% Closely correlated | -9.52% | ||
More | ||||