Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IMCG vs VOT
IMCG vs VOT Comparison
Open Charts IMCG vs VOT
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$78.21
Change+$0.02 (+0.03%)
Volume$55.42K
Net Assets2.7B
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$272.45
Change-$0.23 (-0.08%)
Volume$104
Net Assets27.44B
IMCG vs VOT Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IMCG vs. VOT commentary
Jun 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMCG is a Buy and VOT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VOT has more net assets: 27.4B vs. IMCG (2.7B). VOT has a higher annual dividend yield than IMCG: VOT (7.490) vs IMCG (3.721). IMCG was incepted earlier than VOT: IMCG (21 years) vs VOT (19 years). IMCG (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than VOT (0.07). IMCG has a higher turnover VOT (21.00) vs VOT (21.00).
| IMCG | VOT | IMCG / VOT | |
| Gain YTD | 3.721 | 7.490 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 2.7B | 27.4B | 10% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.06 | 0.07 | 86% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 21.00 | 205% |
| Yield | 0.75 | 0.65 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IMCG | VOT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 82% | 16 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IMCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCG has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCG jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCG | 100% | +0.03% | ||
| FTV - IMCG | 82% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| ARES - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| JEF - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| HLT - IMCG | 79% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| OWL - IMCG | 78% Closely correlated | +1.60% | ||
More | ||||
VOT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VOT has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VOT jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VOT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VOT | 100% | -0.11% | ||
| ARES - VOT | 81% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| APO - VOT | 81% Closely correlated | -0.61% | ||
| TRMB - VOT | 79% Closely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| HLT - VOT | 78% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| CPAY - VOT | 77% Closely correlated | +0.25% | ||
More | ||||