Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IMCG vs VOT
IMCG vs VOT Comparison
Open Charts IMCG vs VOT
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$82.56
Change-$0.25 (-0.30%)
Volume$400
Net Assets2.91B
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$292.78
Change-$0.16 (-0.05%)
Volume$200
Net Assets31.45B
IMCG vs VOT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IMCG vs. VOT commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMCG is a StrongBuy and VOT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VOT has more net assets: 31.5B vs. IMCG (2.91B). VOT has a higher annual dividend yield than IMCG: VOT (15.545) vs IMCG (9.696). IMCG was incepted earlier than VOT: IMCG (21 years) vs VOT (19 years). IMCG (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than VOT (0.07). IMCG has a higher turnover VOT (21.00) vs VOT (21.00).
| IMCG | VOT | IMCG / VOT | |
| Gain YTD | 9.696 | 15.545 | 62% |
| Net Assets | 2.91B | 31.5B | 9% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.06 | 0.07 | 86% |
| Turnover | 35.00 | 21.00 | 167% |
| Yield | 0.75 | 0.63 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IMCG | VOT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 81% | 18 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IMCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCG has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCG jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCG | 100% | -0.28% | ||
| ARES - IMCG | 83% Closely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| JEF - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| FTV - IMCG | 80% Closely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| OWL - IMCG | 80% Closely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| HLT - IMCG | 79% Closely correlated | -1.13% | ||
More | ||||
VOT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VOT has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VOT jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VOT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VOT | 100% | +0.03% | ||
| ARES - VOT | 82% Closely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| APO - VOT | 81% Closely correlated | -1.61% | ||
| TRMB - VOT | 80% Closely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| OWL - VOT | 79% Closely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| CPAY - VOT | 77% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
More | ||||