Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IMCG vs VOT
IMCG vs VOT Comparison
Open Charts IMCG vs VOT
IMCG vs VOT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IMCG vs. VOT commentary
Jul 31, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMCG is a Hold and VOT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VOT has more net assets: 34.8B vs. IMCG (3.88B). IMCG has a higher annual dividend yield than VOT: IMCG (19.538) vs VOT (5.712). IMCG was incepted earlier than VOT: IMCG (22 years) vs VOT (20 years). VOT (0.05) has a lower expense ratio than IMCG (0.06). IMCG has a higher turnover VOT (17.00) vs VOT (17.00).
| IMCG | VOT | IMCG / VOT | |
| Gain YTD | 19.538 | 5.712 | 342% |
| Net Assets | 3.88B | 34.8B | 11% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.06 | 0.05 | 120% |
| Turnover | 45.00 | 17.00 | 265% |
| Yield | 0.61 | 0.59 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IMCG | VOT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 5 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IMCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCG has been closely correlated with ROK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCG jumps, then ROK could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCG | 100% | +1.15% | ||
| ROK - IMCG | 72% Closely correlated | +2.53% | ||
| CMI - IMCG | 66% Loosely correlated | +4.45% | ||
| RRX - IMCG | 65% Loosely correlated | +7.99% | ||
| KEYS - IMCG | 64% Loosely correlated | +5.38% | ||
| AME - IMCG | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.02% | ||
More | ||||
VOT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VOT has been closely correlated with XPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VOT jumps, then XPO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VOT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VOT | 100% | +1.55% | ||
| XPO - VOT | 75% Closely correlated | -0.06% | ||
| RVTY - VOT | 72% Closely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| CZR - VOT | 71% Closely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| SWKS - VOT | 68% Closely correlated | +2.11% | ||
| ROK - VOT | 68% Closely correlated | +2.53% | ||
More | ||||