It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
INDV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePRGO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
INDV’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRGO’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
INDV (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +9.14% price change this week, while PRGO (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -1.83% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +58.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.17%.
INDV is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.
PRGO is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2025.
Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
INDV | PRGO | INDV / PRGO | |
Capitalization | 2.91B | 4.35B | 67% |
EBITDA | 66M | 525M | 13% |
Gain YTD | -33.530 | -14.193 | 236% |
P/E Ratio | 2102.00 | 341.25 | 616% |
Revenue | 1.09B | 4.66B | 23% |
Total Cash | 410M | 751M | 55% |
Total Debt | 282M | 4.07B | 7% |
INDV | PRGO | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 58 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 62 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PRGO's Valuation (58) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INDV (100) in the null industry. This means that PRGO’s stock grew somewhat faster than INDV’s over the last 12 months.
INDV's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRGO (100) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that INDV’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRGO’s over the last 12 months.
INDV's SMR Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as PRGO (88) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that INDV’s stock grew similarly to PRGO’s over the last 12 months.
PRGO's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is in the same range as INDV (56) in the null industry. This means that PRGO’s stock grew similarly to INDV’s over the last 12 months.
PRGO's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is significantly better than the same rating for INDV (100) in the null industry. This means that PRGO’s stock grew significantly faster than INDV’s over the last 12 months.
INDV | PRGO | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago78% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago79% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago64% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago67% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago68% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago62% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago71% | 14 days ago64% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 7 days ago67% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago71% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago58% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that INDV and CAIHF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INDV and CAIHF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INDV | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
INDV | 100% | -0.29% | ||
CAIHF - INDV | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
VTRS - INDV | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.54% | ||
ASRT - INDV | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.23% | ||
MKKGY - INDV | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.22% | ||
OPTN - INDV | 24% Poorly correlated | -16.55% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRGO has been loosely correlated with VTRS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PRGO jumps, then VTRS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PRGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PRGO | 100% | +1.67% | ||
VTRS - PRGO | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.54% | ||
SIGA - PRGO | 26% Poorly correlated | -6.30% | ||
ITCI - PRGO | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
PBH - PRGO | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.85% | ||
INDV - PRGO | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.29% | ||
More |