ING
Price
$16.31
Change
-$0.14 (-0.85%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
54.32B
18 days until earnings call
SVNLY
Price
$5.36
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
17.44B
18 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ING vs SVNLY

Header iconING vs SVNLY Comparison
Open Charts ING vs SVNLYBanner chart's image
ING Groep
Price$16.31
Change-$0.14 (-0.85%)
Volume$2.8M
Capitalization54.32B
Svenska Handelsbanken AB PUBL
Price$5.36
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$95.1K
Capitalization17.44B
ING vs SVNLY Comparison Chart
Loading...
ING
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVNLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ING vs. SVNLY commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ING is a Hold and SVNLY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (ING: $16.31 vs. SVNLY: $5.36)
Brand notoriety: ING and SVNLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ING: 124% vs. SVNLY: 55%
Market capitalization -- ING: $54.32B vs. SVNLY: $17.44B
ING [@Major Banks] is valued at $54.32B. SVNLY’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $17.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ING’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSVNLY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ING’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SVNLY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ING is a better buy in the long-term than SVNLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ING’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVNLY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ING’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SVNLY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SVNLY is a better buy in the short-term than ING.

Price Growth

ING (@Major Banks) experienced а +6.01% price change this week, while SVNLY (@Major Banks) price change was +3.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +2.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

ING is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

SVNLY is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+2.63% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ING($54.3B) has a higher market cap than SVNLY($17.4B). ING (7.46) and SVNLY (7.17) have similar P/E ratio . ING YTD gains are higher at: 5.201 vs. SVNLY (4.892). ING has less debt than SVNLY: ING (150B) vs SVNLY (1.6T). SVNLY has higher revenues than ING: SVNLY (57B) vs ING (22.4B).
INGSVNLYING / SVNLY
Capitalization54.3B17.4B312%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.2014.892106%
P/E Ratio7.467.17104%
Revenue22.4B57B39%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt150B1.6T9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ING vs SVNLY: Fundamental Ratings
ING
SVNLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3129
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2548
SMR RATING
1..100
32
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4844
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5355
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ING's Valuation (29) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SVNLY (93) in the null industry. This means that ING’s stock grew somewhat faster than SVNLY’s over the last 12 months.

ING's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as SVNLY (48) in the null industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to SVNLY’s over the last 12 months.

SVNLY's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as ING (3) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that SVNLY’s stock grew similarly to ING’s over the last 12 months.

SVNLY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as ING (48) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that SVNLY’s stock grew similarly to ING’s over the last 12 months.

ING's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as SVNLY (55) in the null industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to SVNLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INGSVNLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ING
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVNLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PAXGX16.660.14
+0.85%
Impax Global Opportunities Investor
JSVRX28.270.13
+0.46%
JPMorgan Small Cap Value R5
HFECX43.710.19
+0.44%
Janus Henderson European Focus C
FCDIX38.770.15
+0.39%
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Sm Cp I
PSUYX11.66N/A
N/A
Pioneer Global Sustainable Value Y

ING and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ING has been closely correlated with BBVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ING jumps, then BBVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ING
1D Price
Change %
ING100%
-0.85%
BBVA - ING
70%
Closely correlated
N/A
SAN - ING
68%
Closely correlated
N/A
AAVMY - ING
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
SCBFY - ING
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
BCS - ING
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.93%
More

SVNLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SVNLY has been loosely correlated with SVNLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SVNLY jumps, then SVNLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVNLY
1D Price
Change %
SVNLY100%
N/A
SVNLF - SVNLY
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
RY - SVNLY
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
ING - SVNLY
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.85%
NABZY - SVNLY
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.67%
SCBFY - SVNLY
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
More