ING
Price
$23.86
Change
-$0.05 (-0.21%)
Updated
Aug 29, 04:04 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
71.06B
62 days until earnings call
SVNLY
Price
$6.41
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
25.77B
54 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ING vs SVNLY

Header iconING vs SVNLY Comparison
Open Charts ING vs SVNLYBanner chart's image
ING Groep
Price$23.86
Change-$0.05 (-0.21%)
Volume$110
Capitalization71.06B
Svenska Handelsbanken AB PUBL
Price$6.41
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$101.04K
Capitalization25.77B
ING vs SVNLY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ING
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVNLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ING vs. SVNLY commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ING is a StrongBuy and SVNLY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (ING: $23.91 vs. SVNLY: $6.41)
Brand notoriety: ING and SVNLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ING: 110% vs. SVNLY: 58%
Market capitalization -- ING: $71.06B vs. SVNLY: $25.77B
ING [@Major Banks] is valued at $71.06B. SVNLY’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $25.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $827.87B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $131.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ING’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSVNLY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ING’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SVNLY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ING and SVNLY are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ING’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVNLY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ING’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SVNLY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SVNLY is a better buy in the short-term than ING.

Price Growth

ING (@Major Banks) experienced а -3.78% price change this week, while SVNLY (@Major Banks) price change was -1.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +129.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

ING is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

SVNLY is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.79% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ING($71.1B) has a higher market cap than SVNLY($25.8B). ING has higher P/E ratio than SVNLY: ING (10.32) vs SVNLY (9.30). ING YTD gains are higher at: 65.947 vs. SVNLY (61.837). ING has less debt than SVNLY: ING (168B) vs SVNLY (1.57T). SVNLY has higher revenues than ING: SVNLY (60.1B) vs ING (22.6B).
INGSVNLYING / SVNLY
Capitalization71.1B25.8B276%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD65.94761.837107%
P/E Ratio10.329.30111%
Revenue22.6B60.1B38%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt168B1.57T11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ING vs SVNLY: Fundamental Ratings
ING
SVNLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8264
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
623
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4244
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ING's Valuation (75) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as SVNLY (97) in the null industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to SVNLY’s over the last 12 months.

ING's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as SVNLY (23) in the null industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to SVNLY’s over the last 12 months.

ING's SMR Rating (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as SVNLY (100) in the null industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to SVNLY’s over the last 12 months.

ING's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as SVNLY (44) in the null industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to SVNLY’s over the last 12 months.

ING's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as SVNLY (100) in the null industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to SVNLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INGSVNLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ING
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVNLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WEBL32.191.46
+4.75%
Direxion Daily Dow Jones Int Bl 3X ETF
FIRI19.040.19
+1.00%
FIRE Funds Income Target ETF
EYLD37.830.32
+0.85%
Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF
DFAE30.190.13
+0.43%
Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Mkt ETF
XAUG36.330.02
+0.06%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Enh & ModBufETF-Aug

ING and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ING has been closely correlated with BBVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ING jumps, then BBVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ING
1D Price
Change %
ING100%
-0.54%
BBVA - ING
70%
Closely correlated
+1.06%
SAN - ING
68%
Closely correlated
+3.20%
BCS - ING
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
HSBC - ING
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
AAVMY - ING
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
More

SVNLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SVNLY has been loosely correlated with SVNLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SVNLY jumps, then SVNLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVNLY
1D Price
Change %
SVNLY100%
N/A
SVNLF - SVNLY
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RY - SVNLY
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
ING - SVNLY
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
NABZY - SVNLY
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
SCBFY - SVNLY
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
More