INGVF
Price
$20.27
Change
+$1.67 (+8.98%)
Updated
Mar 6 closing price
Capitalization
52.71B
RBSPF
Price
$6.25
Change
+$0.43 (+7.39%)
Updated
Mar 7 closing price
Capitalization
30.53B
Ad is loading...

INGVF vs RBSPF

Header iconINGVF vs RBSPF Comparison
Open Charts INGVF vs RBSPFBanner chart's image
ING Groep
Price$20.27
Change+$1.67 (+8.98%)
Volume$100
Capitalization52.71B
NatWest Group
Price$6.25
Change+$0.43 (+7.39%)
Volume$6.15K
Capitalization30.53B
INGVF vs RBSPF Comparison Chart
Loading...
RBSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
INGVF vs. RBSPF commentary
Mar 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INGVF is a Hold and RBSPF is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 10, 2025
Stock price -- (INGVF: $20.27 vs. RBSPF: $6.25)
Brand notoriety: INGVF and RBSPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: INGVF: 0% vs. RBSPF: 35%
Market capitalization -- INGVF: $52.71B vs. RBSPF: $30.53B
INGVF [@Major Banks] is valued at $52.71B. RBSPF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $30.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

INGVF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRBSPF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • INGVF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RBSPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RBSPF is a better buy in the long-term than INGVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RBSPF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • RBSPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

INGVF (@Major Banks) experienced а +15.83% price change this week, while RBSPF (@Major Banks) price change was +2.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.43% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
INGVF($52.7B) has a higher market cap than RBSPF($30.5B). RBSPF (10.02) and INGVF (9.91) have similar P/E ratio . INGVF YTD gains are higher at: 33.355 vs. RBSPF (30.208).
INGVFRBSPFINGVF / RBSPF
Capitalization52.7B30.5B173%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD33.35530.208110%
P/E Ratio9.9110.0299%
Revenue19.6BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt125BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
INGVF vs RBSPF: Fundamental Ratings
INGVF
RBSPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2914
SMR RATING
1..100
35
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3837
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RBSPF's Valuation (49) in the null industry is in the same range as INGVF (54). This means that RBSPF’s stock grew similarly to INGVF’s over the last 12 months.

RBSPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as INGVF (29). This means that RBSPF’s stock grew similarly to INGVF’s over the last 12 months.

INGVF's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as RBSPF (5). This means that INGVF’s stock grew similarly to RBSPF’s over the last 12 months.

RBSPF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as INGVF (38). This means that RBSPF’s stock grew similarly to INGVF’s over the last 12 months.

RBSPF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as INGVF (100). This means that RBSPF’s stock grew similarly to INGVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RBSPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
RBSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PXE27.180.47
+1.76%
Invesco Energy Exploration & Prod ETF
VALQ62.880.85
+1.37%
American Century® U.S. Quality Value ETF
HAUZ20.440.17
+0.82%
Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF
AVLV66.600.44
+0.67%
Avantis US Large Cap Value ETF
AUGZ38.100.17
+0.44%
TrueShares Structured Outcome August ETF

INGVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that INGVF and RY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INGVF and RY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INGVF
1D Price
Change %
INGVF100%
N/A
RY - INGVF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.73%
ANZGF - INGVF
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.78%
ING - INGVF
27%
Poorly correlated
+3.70%
BNS - INGVF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
BMO - INGVF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
More

RBSPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RBSPF and TD have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RBSPF and TD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBSPF
1D Price
Change %
RBSPF100%
+7.30%
TD - RBSPF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
BCS - RBSPF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
ING - RBSPF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.70%
NABZY - RBSPF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
INGVF - RBSPF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More