INGVF
Price
$15.56
Change
+$0.36 (+2.37%)
Updated
Jan 13 closing price
Capitalization
52.71B
RY
Price
$120.54
Change
+$0.46 (+0.38%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
142.17B
33 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

INGVF vs RY

Header iconINGVF vs RY Comparison
Open Charts INGVF vs RYBanner chart's image
ING Groep
Price$15.56
Change+$0.36 (+2.37%)
Volume$491
Capitalization52.71B
Royal Bank of Canada
Price$120.54
Change+$0.46 (+0.38%)
Volume$1.59M
Capitalization142.17B
INGVF vs RY Comparison Chart
Loading...
INGVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
INGVF vs. RY commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INGVF is a Hold and RY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (INGVF: $15.56 vs. RY: $120.54)
Brand notoriety: INGVF and RY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: INGVF: 0% vs. RY: 156%
Market capitalization -- INGVF: $52.71B vs. RY: $142.17B
INGVF [@Major Banks] is valued at $52.71B. RY’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $142.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

INGVF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • INGVF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, RY is a better buy in the long-term than INGVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

INGVF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • INGVF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • RY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RY is a better buy in the short-term than INGVF.

Price Growth

INGVF (@Major Banks) experienced а +2.37% price change this week, while RY (@Major Banks) price change was +1.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +2.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

RY is expected to report earnings on Feb 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+2.63% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RY($142B) has a higher market cap than INGVF($52.7B). RY has higher P/E ratio than INGVF: RY (12.58) vs INGVF (9.91). INGVF YTD gains are higher at: 2.368 vs. RY (0.025). INGVF has less debt than RY: INGVF (125B) vs RY (442B). RY has higher revenues than INGVF: RY (56.4B) vs INGVF (19.6B).
INGVFRYINGVF / RY
Capitalization52.7B142B37%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.3680.0259,514%
P/E Ratio9.9112.5879%
Revenue19.6B56.4B35%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt125B442B28%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
INGVF vs RY: Fundamental Ratings
INGVF
RY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5015
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5831
SMR RATING
1..100
32
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5750
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6329
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

INGVF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RY (93) in the Major Banks industry. This means that INGVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RY’s over the last 12 months.

RY's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as INGVF (58) in the null industry. This means that RY’s stock grew similarly to INGVF’s over the last 12 months.

RY's SMR Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as INGVF (3) in the null industry. This means that RY’s stock grew similarly to INGVF’s over the last 12 months.

RY's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as INGVF (57) in the null industry. This means that RY’s stock grew similarly to INGVF’s over the last 12 months.

RY's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INGVF (63) in the null industry. This means that RY’s stock grew somewhat faster than INGVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INGVFRY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
INGVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XCLR28.110.25
+0.89%
Global X S&P 500® Collar 95-110 ETF
QDF71.520.62
+0.87%
FlexShares Quality Dividend ETF
BKGI31.430.23
+0.73%
BNY Mellon Global Infras Inc ETF
MBOX33.930.18
+0.55%
Freedom Day Dividend ETF
USDU27.840.06
+0.22%
WisdomTree Bloomberg US Dllr Bullish ETF

INGVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that INGVF and RY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INGVF and RY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INGVF
1D Price
Change %
INGVF100%
N/A
RY - INGVF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
ANZGF - INGVF
28%
Poorly correlated
+3.22%
ING - INGVF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
BNS - INGVF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
BMO - INGVF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
More

RY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RY has been closely correlated with CM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RY jumps, then CM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RY
1D Price
Change %
RY100%
+0.38%
CM - RY
68%
Closely correlated
-0.10%
EWBC - RY
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
BNS - RY
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.59%
ANZGY - RY
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.56%
NTIOF - RY
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.26%
More