Advertisement
INSP vs PCHM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INSP is a Hold and PCHM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
INSP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePCHM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- INSP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PCHM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
INSP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PCHM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- INSP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- PCHM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
INSP (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +0.72% price change this week, while PCHM (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +2.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.53%.
Reported Earning Dates
INSP is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical/Nursing Services (+2.93% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| INSP | PCHM | INSP / PCHM | |
| Capitalization | 2.47B | 17.3M | 14,254% |
| EBITDA | 69.6M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -55.011 | 22.549 | -244% |
| P/E Ratio | 47.93 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 861M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 301M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 33.1M | N/A | - |
INSP | PCHM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | 6 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 74 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 77 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 48 | 10 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PCHM's Valuation (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for INSP (73) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that PCHM’s stock grew significantly faster than INSP’s over the last 12 months.
PCHM's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as INSP (100) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that PCHM’s stock grew similarly to INSP’s over the last 12 months.
INSP's SMR Rating (77) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as PCHM (95) in the null industry. This means that INSP’s stock grew similarly to PCHM’s over the last 12 months.
PCHM's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INSP (93) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that PCHM’s stock grew somewhat faster than INSP’s over the last 12 months.
PCHM's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as INSP (100) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that PCHM’s stock grew similarly to INSP’s over the last 12 months.
| INSP | PCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 3 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 23 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 76% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 1 day ago 74% |
Advertisement
INSP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INSP has been loosely correlated with BRKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INSP jumps, then BRKR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INSP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INSP | 100% | +4.25% | ||
| BRKR - INSP | 41% Loosely correlated | +3.61% | ||
| AVNS - INSP | 38% Loosely correlated | +3.54% | ||
| AZTA - INSP | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.92% | ||
| MASI - INSP | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.25% | ||
| BFLY - INSP | 36% Loosely correlated | +15.95% | ||
More | ||||
PCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PCHM and INSP have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCHM and INSP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCHM | 100% | N/A | ||
| INSP - PCHM | 24% Poorly correlated | +4.25% | ||
| TNON - PCHM | 22% Poorly correlated | +4.32% | ||
| OTCFF - PCHM | 20% Poorly correlated | +29.97% | ||
| BSX - PCHM | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.27% | ||
| EW - PCHM | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.86% | ||
More | ||||