This comparison examines INTC and LSCC to provide traders and investors with insights into their relative positioning within the semiconductor industry. The analysis focuses on business models, recent performance trends, and key differentiators that influence market dynamics. Institutional and retail participants seeking to understand sector-specific opportunities, momentum shifts, and risk profiles may find this overview relevant for portfolio construction or tactical allocation decisions in the current environment.
Intel Corporation designs and manufactures microprocessors, chipsets, and related technologies for computing, data center, and networking applications. In recent market activity, INTC shares exhibited substantial volatility, closing near $102.94 on September 11, 2026, after earlier sessions with gains exceeding 9% offset by subsequent declines. The stock has delivered strong longer-term returns, including over 300% in the trailing year, supported by progress on its 18A manufacturing process and expanded server processor demand. Q2 2026 results showed revenue of $16.1 billion, up 25% year-over-year, with gross margin expansion reflecting operational improvements in its Arizona facilities and AI PC initiatives.
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation develops field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) and related software solutions primarily for communications, computing, industrial, and automotive markets. In recent market activity, LSCC shares traded around $119.76 as of September 11, 2026, reflecting a year-to-date advance of approximately 63% and a trailing twelve-month gain near 81%. The company reported Q2 2026 revenue of $201 million, representing 62% year-over-year growth, with gross margins near 70%. Recent weeks have seen a modest pullback of about 7% over the prior month amid sector-wide adjustments, though the firm maintains focus on AI infrastructure and edge computing applications.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating suitability for prevailing market conditions, including consistent backtested performance metrics and alignment with current volatility patterns, appear in this section. Available bots span diverse trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and statistical profiles, with performance ranges varying by configuration and ticker universe. This resource enables users to explore automated approaches tailored to individual risk parameters and objectives.
INTC operates a vertically integrated model encompassing design, manufacturing, and foundry services, exposing it to broader cyclical semiconductor demand and capital-intensive process node transitions. In contrast, LSCC maintains a fabless approach centered on programmable logic devices, offering higher gross margins and lower capital requirements but narrower product focus. Recent momentum favors INTC on absolute scale and AI PC catalysts, while LSCC shows steadier sequential revenue expansion in specialized AI segments. Risk factors include INTC’s execution on manufacturing ramps versus LSCC’s sensitivity to FPGA order cycles and competition. Sector exposure positions INTC across consumer and enterprise computing, whereas LSCC emphasizes communications and industrial edge applications with comparatively lower leverage.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in quarterly results and relative positioning within AI-driven demand, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a probabilistic edge to LSCC due to its focused growth trajectory and margin profile amid sector volatility. INTC demonstrates potential through scale and process milestones but faces greater variability in near-term execution signals. This assessment reflects historical patterns and current data without implying future outcomes.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| INTC | LSCC | INTC / LSCC | |
| Capitalization | 534B | 15.1B | 3,536% |
| EBITDA | 3.68B | 98.7M | 3,724% |
| Gain YTD | 173.848 | 44.496 | 391% |
| P/E Ratio | 904.17 | 425.32 | 213% |
| Revenue | 57B | 651M | 8,756% |
| Total Cash | 29.7B | 173M | 17,168% |
| Total Debt | 50.5B | 38.1M | 132,546% |
INTC | LSCC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 29 | 69 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 51 | 53 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 83 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LSCC's Valuation (94) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as INTC (98). This means that LSCC’s stock grew similarly to INTC’s over the last 12 months.
INTC's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as LSCC (53). This means that INTC’s stock grew similarly to LSCC’s over the last 12 months.
LSCC's SMR Rating (83) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as INTC (94). This means that LSCC’s stock grew similarly to INTC’s over the last 12 months.
INTC's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as LSCC (59). This means that INTC’s stock grew similarly to LSCC’s over the last 12 months.
LSCC's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INTC (78). This means that LSCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than INTC’s over the last 12 months.
| INTC | LSCC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 73% | 10 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 81% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
INTC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while LSCC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
INTC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LSCC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
INTC (@Semiconductors) experienced а -4.89% price change this week, while LSCC (@Semiconductors) price change was -7.91% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +47.46%.
INTC is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
LSCC is expected to report earnings on Nov 02, 2026.
The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INTC has been loosely correlated with MXL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INTC jumps, then MXL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INTC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INTC | 100% | +4.03% | ||
| MXL - INTC | 58% Loosely correlated | +3.56% | ||
| RMBS - INTC | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.05% | ||
| LSCC - INTC | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| AMD - INTC | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.65% | ||
| MU - INTC | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.11% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LSCC has been closely correlated with KLIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LSCC jumps, then KLIC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LSCC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSCC | 100% | -0.16% | ||
| KLIC - LSCC | 76% Closely correlated | +0.96% | ||
| ENTG - LSCC | 73% Closely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| KLAC - LSCC | 73% Closely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| ALGM - LSCC | 70% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| MPWR - LSCC | 70% Closely correlated | +0.45% | ||
More | ||||