INTO
Price
$0.35
Change
-$0.07 (-16.67%)
Updated
Jan 7 closing price
Capitalization
2.18M
KMNCF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.04 (-19.05%)
Updated
Dec 9 closing price
Capitalization
50.81M
Ad is loading...

INTO vs KMNCF

Header iconINTO vs KMNCF Comparison
Open Charts INTO vs KMNCFBanner chart's image
Initio
Price$0.35
Change-$0.07 (-16.67%)
Volume$5.1K
Capitalization2.18M
Kingsmen Creatives
Price$0.17
Change-$0.04 (-19.05%)
Volume$443
Capitalization50.81M
INTO vs KMNCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
INTO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KMNCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
INTO vs. KMNCF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INTO is a Hold and KMNCF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (INTO: $0.35 vs. KMNCF: $0.17)
Brand notoriety: INTO and KMNCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: INTO: 154% vs. KMNCF: 6%
Market capitalization -- INTO: $2.18M vs. KMNCF: $50.81M
INTO [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $2.18M. KMNCF’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $50.81M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

INTO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKMNCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • INTO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KMNCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, KMNCF is a better buy in the long-term than INTO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

INTO’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KMNCF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • INTO’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • KMNCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KMNCF is a better buy in the short-term than INTO.

Price Growth

INTO (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KMNCF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +0.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.35%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+0.70% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KMNCF($50.8M) has a higher market cap than INTO($2.18M). KMNCF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. INTO (-16.667). KMNCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.97M vs. INTO (236K). INTO has less debt than KMNCF: INTO (668K) vs KMNCF (35.7M). KMNCF has higher revenues than INTO: KMNCF (278M) vs INTO (209K).
INTOKMNCFINTO / KMNCF
Capitalization2.18M50.8M4%
EBITDA236K8.97M3%
Gain YTD-16.6670.000-
P/E RatioN/A13.00-
Revenue209K278M0%
Total CashN/A72.4M-
Total Debt668K35.7M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
INTO vs KMNCF: Fundamental Ratings
INTO
KMNCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10086
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8376
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10010
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KMNCF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as INTO (35). This means that KMNCF’s stock grew similarly to INTO’s over the last 12 months.

KMNCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as INTO (100). This means that KMNCF’s stock grew similarly to INTO’s over the last 12 months.

KMNCF's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as INTO (100). This means that KMNCF’s stock grew similarly to INTO’s over the last 12 months.

KMNCF's Price Growth Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as INTO (83). This means that KMNCF’s stock grew similarly to INTO’s over the last 12 months.

KMNCF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for INTO (100). This means that KMNCF’s stock grew significantly faster than INTO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INTOKMNCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
20%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
23%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
20%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
8%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
19%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
INTO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KMNCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OEF292.213.43
+1.19%
iShares S&P 100 ETF
NFTY55.000.56
+1.03%
First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Wtd ETF
FDEC45.240.42
+0.94%
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Dec
RSPE27.100.14
+0.54%
Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
SAUG23.890.06
+0.26%
FT Vest U.S. Sm Cp Mod Buf ETF -Aug

KMNCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KMNCF and IPSOF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KMNCF and IPSOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KMNCF
1D Price
Change %
KMNCF100%
N/A
IPSOF - KMNCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KBRLF - KMNCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INTO - KMNCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HZNOF - KMNCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IVDA - KMNCF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-2.54%
More