Ad is loading...
INUTX vs RMEBX
INUTX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts INUTX vs RMEBX
Columbia Dividend Opportunity A
Price$35.48
Change+$0.46 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$53.26
Change+$0.76 (+1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.8B
INUTX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
INUTX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INUTX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 95.8B vs. INUTX (1.91B). INUTX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: INUTX (2.59) vs RMEBX (1.18). INUTX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: INUTX (37 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). INUTX (1.07) and RMEBX (1.07) have similar cost to investors . INUTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than INUTX: RMEBX (250) vs INUTX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.74 vs. INUTX (-2.57). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 52.21 vs. INUTX (34.25).
| INUTX | RMEBX | INUTX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.07 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.07 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.963 | -2.724 | 219% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.91B | 95.8B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.59 | 1.18 | 219% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.57 | 1.74 | -148% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.07 | 5.82 | -18% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.25 | 52.21 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.83 | 53.41 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...