Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
INUTX vs RMEBX
INUTX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts INUTX vs RMEBX
Columbia Dividend Opportunity A
Price$40.48
Change-$0.17 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.18B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.43
Change-$0.10 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.45B
INUTX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
INUTX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INUTX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. INUTX (2.18B). INUTX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: INUTX (2.49) vs RMEBX (1.09). INUTX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: INUTX (37 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). INUTX (1.07) and RMEBX (1.07) have similar cost to investors . INUTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than INUTX: RMEBX (250) vs INUTX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.34 vs. INUTX (5.41). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 54.40 vs. INUTX (43.71).
| INUTX | RMEBX | INUTX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.07 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.07 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.967 | 10.667 | 93% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.18B | 109B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.49 | 1.09 | 228% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.41 | 6.34 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.70 | 30.40 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.71 | 54.40 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.00 | 92.70 | 51% |