IPAY
Price
$43.63
Change
-$0.27 (-0.62%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:35 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
149.71M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KOMP
Price
$68.95
Change
-$1.84 (-2.60%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
2.81B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IPAY vs KOMP

IPAY vs KOMP Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Amplify Digital Payments ETF (IPAY) vs. State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP)

Key Takeaways

  • IPAY offers concentrated exposure to ~40 global digital payments companies, while KOMP provides broader diversification across 482 innovative firms disrupting multiple industries.
  • IPAY's expense ratio of 0.75% is significantly higher than KOMP's low-cost 0.20%, impacting long-term cost efficiency.
  • IPAY emphasizes financial services (41%) and technology (55%), whereas KOMP balances technology (~33%), industrials (~28%), and healthcare (~12%) for reduced sector risk.
  • Top 10 holdings represent over 54% of IPAY, indicating higher concentration risk, compared to under 10% in KOMP.
  • Both are passive thematic ETFs, but KOMP's tiered weighting and annual reconstitution enhance adaptability to innovation trends.
  • KOMP exhibits stronger trend consistency and lower relative volatility due to broader exposure in recent market cycles.

Introduction

In an era of accelerating digital transformation, ETFs targeting fintech innovation and broader technological disruption have garnered investor interest. The Amplify Digital Payments ETF (IPAY) and State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) offer alternative pathways to thematic growth. IPAY focuses narrowly on mobile and digital payments infrastructure, capitalizing on e-commerce and cashless trends. KOMP, conversely, captures a wider "new economies" theme, including AI, robotics, and automation across sectors. While not direct competitors, both appeal to investors seeking exposure to exponential technologies amid rising capital flows into innovation. This comparison highlights their structural differences, aiding decisions on sector-specific versus diversified thematic positioning.

Amplify Digital Payments ETF (IPAY) Overview

The Amplify Digital Payments ETF (IPAY) is a passive thematic ETF that seeks to track the Nasdaq CTA Global Digital Payments Index (WALLET). This modified market-cap weighted index targets companies delivering payment-related products and services, including card networks, processors, and software solutions. The fund holds approximately 40 securities, with top 10 holdings comprising over 54% of assets: Block Inc. (~6%), SQ (~6%), V (~6%), MA (~5.5%), Adyen NV (~5.5%), Affirm Holdings Inc. (~5.5%), Wise Group PLC (~5.5%), AXP (~5%), COF (~5%), COIN (~5%), and PYPL (~5%). Sector allocations tilt heavily toward technology (55%) and financial services (41%), with minor industrials (4%). The expense ratio is 0.75%, and the index rebalances quarterly. As a non-diversified fund, IPAY provides targeted liquidity in global fintech transaction volumes but carries concentration risk.

State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) Overview

The State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) is a passive thematic ETF tracking the S&P Kensho New Economies Composite Index. This AI-powered index uses natural language processing on regulatory filings to identify and equally weight (within tiers) ~482 U.S.-listed global companies driving disruption via robotics, AI, automation, and processing power. Top 10 holdings account for ~10%: Elbit Systems Ltd. (1.6%), Bloom Energy Corp. (1.2%), ON Semiconductor Corp. (1.1%), Teledyne Technologies Inc. (1.1%), Himax Technologies Inc. (1.0%), Iridium Communications Inc. (0.9%), 3D Systems Corp. (0.8%), Bruker Corp. (0.8%), Generac Holdings Inc. (0.8%), and Twist Bioscience Corp. (0.7%). Sector breakdown features technology (~33%), industrials (~28%), healthcare (~12%), utilities (~5%), and communication services (~6%). The expense ratio is a low 0.20%, with annual reconstitution based on Sharpe ratios across sub-indexes. KOMP's diversified structure mitigates single-sector volatility while capturing broad innovation.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The digital payments and new economies sectors thrive amid global digitization, with mobile payments projected to expand from $3 trillion in 2023 to $28 trillion by 2032 at a 28% CAGR (compound annual growth rate). Catalysts include AI-driven fraud prevention, stablecoin adoption for settlements, real-time payment rails like FedNow, and regulatory clarity on CBDCs (central bank digital currencies). Macro drivers such as e-commerce growth, smartphone penetration, and tokenized assets fuel IPAY's focus. KOMP benefits from AI investments, robotics in manufacturing, and automation, with hyperscaler CapEx hitting $561 billion in 2026 for data centers. Risks encompass interest rate sensitivity affecting fintech lending, geopolitical tensions disrupting supply chains, and regulatory scrutiny on crypto exposures. Capital flows favor diversified innovation over narrow fintech amid sector rotation.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, KOMP has demonstrated superior relative positioning, capturing ~38-44% gains over the past year through diversified exposure to AI and industrials amid tech rallies. IPAY, more sensitive to fintech earnings and consumer finance pressures, posted year-to-date declines around -10% and one-year returns near -11%, trailing broader equities. Over recent months, IPAY experienced heightened volatility from buy-now-pay-later slowdowns and payment network challenges, while KOMP's broader base buffered drawdowns. KOMP's lower concentration and balanced sectors align better with sector rotation toward industrials and utilities, contrasting IPAY's reliance on financials amid interest rate expectations. Both exhibit growth beta, but KOMP's structure supports trend consistency.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors KOMP with moderate conviction (~65% probability of outperformance over the next cycle). Its superior cost efficiency, extensive diversification (482 holdings), balanced sector momentum in innovation themes, and lower concentration risk provide structural advantages over IPAY's narrower, higher-cost exposure. While IPAY suits pure-play digital payments bulls, KOMP's adaptability positions it better amid macro shifts.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IPAY vs. KOMP commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPAY is a Hold and KOMP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KOMP has more net assets: 2.81B vs. IPAY (150M). KOMP has a higher annual dividend yield than IPAY: KOMP (18.836) vs IPAY (-15.657). IPAY was incepted earlier than KOMP: IPAY (11 years) vs KOMP (8 years). KOMP (0.20) has a lower expense ratio than IPAY (0.75). KOMP has a higher turnover IPAY (29.00) vs IPAY (29.00).
IPAYKOMPIPAY / KOMP
Gain YTD-15.65718.836-83%
Net Assets150M2.81B5%
Total Expense Ratio0.750.20375%
Turnover29.0045.0064%
Yield0.881.4262%
Fund Existence11 years8 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IPAYKOMP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IPAY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KOMP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LAVYX17.38N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity I
BRLVX29.51N/A
N/A
American Beacon Man Lg Cp Value R5
FTASX33.58N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% M
WBBIX9.78N/A
N/A
TETON Westwood Balanced I
PJVQX27.31N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Value R6

IPAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPAY has been closely correlated with XYZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IPAY jumps, then XYZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IPAY
1D Price
Change %
IPAY100%
-1.15%
XYZ - IPAY
72%
Closely correlated
-2.29%
GPN - IPAY
72%
Closely correlated
-2.68%
TOST - IPAY
69%
Closely correlated
-1.62%
AFRM - IPAY
69%
Closely correlated
-2.33%
PYPL - IPAY
67%
Closely correlated
-0.40%
More

KOMP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KOMP has been closely correlated with HUT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KOMP jumps, then HUT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KOMP
1D Price
Change %
KOMP100%
-0.78%
HUT - KOMP
71%
Closely correlated
-2.77%
RIOT - KOMP
70%
Closely correlated
+1.89%
BLK - KOMP
68%
Closely correlated
+0.16%
CLSK - KOMP
68%
Closely correlated
+1.31%
MARA - KOMP
68%
Closely correlated
+4.43%
More