IPI
Price
$36.07
Change
+$1.71 (+4.98%)
Updated
Jun 12, 12:51 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
461.56M
54 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MOS
Price
$22.64
Change
+$1.55 (+7.35%)
Updated
Jun 12, 03:36 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.7B
52 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IPI vs MOS

Header iconIPI vs MOS Comparison
Open Charts IPI vs MOSBanner chart's image
IPI vs MOS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Intrepid Potash, Inc. (IPI) vs. The Mosaic Company (MOS) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • IPI shares have gained approximately 36% year-to-date (YTD), significantly outperforming MOS's roughly -8% YTD decline amid fertilizer sector pressures.
  • Intrepid Potash reported Q1 2026 adjusted EPS of $0.62, beating estimates by 29%, with sales of $98.7 million and adjusted EBITDA of $19 million.
  • The Mosaic Company faces Q1 2026 earnings on May 11 with expected EPS of $0.20, down 59% year-over-year, following Q4 2025 misses on weak volumes.
  • IPI trades at a trailing P/E (price-to-earnings ratio) of about 34x with no dividend, while MOS offers a 4% yield at 13x P/E but higher volatility risks from global operations.
  • Both operate in potash and fertilizers, but IPI focuses on U.S. production with recent asset sales enhancing cash position, contrasting MOS's broader phosphate exposure.
  • Recent momentum favors IPI due to operational efficiencies and supportive potash pricing.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines IPI and MOS, two key players in the fertilizer sector focused on potash production essential for global agriculture. Both companies navigate volatile commodity prices, supply chain dynamics, and demand from crop nutrients amid shifting market conditions. Traders seeking short-term momentum and investors eyeing relative performance in basic materials will find value in analyzing their recent trajectories, business models, and risk profiles. This analysis highlights contrasts in scale, recent financial results, and market positioning to inform stock comparison decisions in the current environment.

IPI Overview and Recent Performance

Intrepid Potash, Inc. (IPI) is the only U.S. producer of muriate of potash, alongside its Trio specialty fertilizer delivering potassium, magnesium, and sulfate. Operating mines in New Mexico, Utah, and recently divesting non-core South Ranch assets for $70 million, the company has refocused on core fertilizer operations. In recent market activity, IPI shares have shown strength, up about 36% YTD and trading around $38 with a market cap of $508 million. Q1 2026 results featured sales of $98.7 million, net income of $6.9 million ($0.52 per share), and adjusted EBITDA of $19 million, driven by higher potash and Trio prices, resilient demand, and operational gains like a new continuous miner boosting Trio efficiency. Sentiment has improved on these beats (EPS surprise +29%) and cash reserves near $100 million, though beta of 1.26 signals higher volatility versus the market.

MOS Overview and Recent Performance

The Mosaic Company (MOS) is a leading global producer of concentrated phosphate and potash crop nutrients, operating through Phosphates, Potash, and Mosaic Fertilizantes segments with mines in the U.S. and Canada. Recent weeks have pressured shares, down roughly 8% YTD and trading near $22 with a $7 billion market cap, reflecting broader fertilizer headwinds. Q4 2025 sales rose 6% to $2.97 billion but missed estimates, with adjusted EPS of $0.22 versus $0.45 year-ago amid lower volumes and rising costs, despite higher prices. Q1 2026 consensus anticipates EPS of $0.20 and $2.75 billion revenue, supported by demand but tempered by input inflation. Beta of 0.80 indicates lower market sensitivity, and a 4% dividend yield appeals to income seekers, though idling Brazilian operations signals cost controls.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates over 25 top-performing AI trading bots from a library of 351, selected for their suitability to current market conditions across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like trend trading, multi-agent systems with take-profit/stop-loss corridors (e.g., 3% TP/2% SL), and double agents on 5min, 15min, or 60min timeframes. Performance stats shine with annualized returns from +23% to +285%, win rates of 51-88%, profit factors up to 11.7, and profit-to-drawdown ratios to 19. Covering sectors like semiconductors (e.g., NVDA, AVGO), industrials, space materials, data centers, and gold miners, they deliver real-time signals for copy trading. Examples include a space infrastructure bot at +285% annualized (72% win rate) and semiconductors at +96% (64% win rate). Explore these high-conviction options tailored to volatility and growth themes at Trending AI Robots.

Head-to-Head Comparison

IPI and MOS share potash exposure but differ in scale and diversification: IPI’s U.S.-centric model (~$300M revenue) emphasizes purity with Trio growth drivers, while MOS (~$12B enterprise value) leverages global phosphate leadership. Recent momentum tilts to IPI (36% YTD vs. MOS -8%), fueled by earnings beats and asset monetization versus MOS’s volume misses. Risk factors include IPI’s higher beta (1.26 vs. 0.80) and no dividend, trading at 34x P/E premium to MOS’s 13x with 4% yield. Sector sentiment favors potash stability, but MOS’s international footprint heightens geopolitical exposure trade-offs.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors IPI over MOS based on superior trend consistency, YTD relative performance, and recent positive earnings catalysts like Q1 beats and operational efficiencies. IPI’s focused potash positioning aligns with resilient demand, offering probabilistic edge in momentum-driven environments, though MOS’s scale and yield provide stability if phosphate rebounds.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IPI vs. MOS commentary
Jun 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPI is a Hold and MOS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 12, 2026
Stock price -- (IPI: $34.36 vs. MOS: $21.09)
Brand notoriety: IPI: Not notable vs. MOS: Notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Agricultural industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IPI: 56% vs. MOS: 144%
Market capitalization -- IPI: $461.56M vs. MOS: $6.7B
IPI [@Chemicals: Agricultural] is valued at $461.56M. MOS’s [@Chemicals: Agricultural] market capitalization is $6.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry ranges from $50.07B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry is $9.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IPI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMOS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • IPI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MOS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MOS is a better buy in the long-term than IPI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IPI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MOS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IPI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MOS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MOS is a better buy in the short-term than IPI.

Price Growth

IPI (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а -7.58% price change this week, while MOS (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was -7.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

IPI is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

MOS is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Agricultural (+0.22% weekly)

The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MOS($6.7B) has a higher market cap than IPI($462M). MOS has higher P/E ratio than IPI: MOS (150.64) vs IPI (30.95). IPI YTD gains are higher at: 23.909 vs. MOS (-10.818). MOS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.99B vs. IPI (55.4M). MOS has more cash in the bank: 282M vs. IPI (99.3M). IPI has less debt than MOS: IPI (3.68M) vs MOS (5.76B). MOS has higher revenues than IPI: MOS (12.4B) vs IPI (302M).
IPIMOSIPI / MOS
Capitalization462M6.7B7%
EBITDA55.4M1.99B3%
Gain YTD23.909-10.818-221%
P/E Ratio30.95150.6421%
Revenue302M12.4B2%
Total Cash99.3M282M35%
Total Debt3.68M5.76B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IPI vs MOS: Fundamental Ratings
IPI
MOS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5466
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
92100
SMR RATING
1..100
9091
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6365
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
883
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a47

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MOS's Valuation (16) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IPI (66) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that MOS’s stock grew somewhat faster than IPI’s over the last 12 months.

IPI's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as MOS (100) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that IPI’s stock grew similarly to MOS’s over the last 12 months.

IPI's SMR Rating (90) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as MOS (91) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that IPI’s stock grew similarly to MOS’s over the last 12 months.

IPI's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as MOS (65) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that IPI’s stock grew similarly to MOS’s over the last 12 months.

MOS's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is significantly better than the same rating for IPI (88) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that MOS’s stock grew significantly faster than IPI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IPIMOS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IPI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MOS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RPRCX8.860.25
+2.90%
Royce Premier Consult
GTTIX26.08N/A
N/A
Gabelli Global Content & Connect I
MGRAX46.64N/A
N/A
MFS International Growth A
ACSCX9.94N/A
N/A
American Century Small Cap Value A
QSERX21.59N/A
N/A
AQR Small Cap Multi-Style R6

IPI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPI has been closely correlated with CF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IPI jumps, then CF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IPI
1D Price
Change %
IPI100%
+1.66%
CF - IPI
69%
Closely correlated
-2.47%
NTR - IPI
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
MOS - IPI
55%
Loosely correlated
+6.41%
CTVA - IPI
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
UAN - IPI
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.63%
More