Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IPOAX vs RNWHX
IPOAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts IPOAX vs RNWHX
IPOAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IPOAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPOAX is a Hold and RNWHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. IPOAX (662M). IPOAX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: IPOAX (1.78) vs RNWHX (1.17). IPOAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: IPOAX (33 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). IPOAX (1.49) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. IPOAX (39.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than IPOAX: RNWHX (250) vs IPOAX (1000). IPOAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.58 vs. RNWHX (22.38). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 22.98 vs. IPOAX (9.38).
| IPOAX | RNWHX | IPOAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.72 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 0.72 | 207% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.393 | 17.024 | 137% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 662M | 88.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 1.17 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.58 | 22.38 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.16 | 55.91 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.38 | 22.98 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.86 | 108.52 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers