Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IPOAX vs RNWHX
IPOAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts IPOAX vs RNWHX
IPOAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IPOAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPOAX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. IPOAX (714M). IPOAX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: IPOAX (1.70) vs RNWHX (1.15). IPOAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: IPOAX (33 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). IPOAX (1.49) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. IPOAX (28.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than IPOAX: RNWHX (250) vs IPOAX (1000). IPOAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.68 vs. RNWHX (31.15). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 20.21 vs. IPOAX (3.78).
| IPOAX | RNWHX | IPOAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.72 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 0.72 | 207% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.301 | 18.743 | 156% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 714M | 90.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.70 | 1.15 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.68 | 31.15 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.12 | 57.37 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.78 | 20.21 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.51 | 132.48 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement