Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IPOAX vs RNWHX
IPOAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts IPOAX vs RNWHX
IPOAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IPOAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPOAX is a Hold and RNWHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. IPOAX (649M). IPOAX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: IPOAX (1.73) vs RNWHX (1.15). IPOAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: IPOAX (33 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). IPOAX (1.50) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. IPOAX (39.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than IPOAX: RNWHX (250) vs IPOAX (1000). IPOAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.87 vs. RNWHX (17.19). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 17.68 vs. IPOAX (4.05).
| IPOAX | RNWHX | IPOAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.72 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.72 | 208% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.284 | 16.447 | 154% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 649M | 90B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.73 | 1.15 | 151% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.87 | 17.19 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.81 | 53.84 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.05 | 17.68 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.38 | 111.44 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers