Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IPOAX vs RNWHX
IPOAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts IPOAX vs RNWHX
IPOAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IPOAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPOAX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 85.6B vs. IPOAX (719M). IPOAX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: IPOAX (1.70) vs RNWHX (1.15). IPOAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: IPOAX (33 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). IPOAX (1.49) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. IPOAX (28.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than IPOAX: RNWHX (250) vs IPOAX (1000). IPOAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.57 vs. RNWHX (29.50). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 19.26 vs. IPOAX (0.41).
| IPOAX | RNWHX | IPOAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.72 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 0.72 | 207% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.938 | 16.719 | 161% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 719M | 85.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.70 | 1.15 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.57 | 29.50 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.77 | 56.33 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.41 | 19.26 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.53 | 121.12 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement