Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IPOCX vs RNWBX
IPOCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts IPOCX vs RNWBX
Macquarie Systematic Em Mkts Eq C
Price$17.80
Change-$0.13 (-0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets690.49M
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.33
Change-$0.10 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.53B
IPOCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IPOCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Sep 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPOCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.5B vs. IPOCX (690M). IPOCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: IPOCX (3.33) vs RNWBX (0.13). IPOCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: IPOCX (29 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). IPOCX (2.26) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. IPOCX (28.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than IPOCX: RNWBX (250) vs IPOCX (1000). IPOCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.43 vs. RNWBX (14.61). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 27.18 vs. IPOCX (-2.00).
| IPOCX | RNWBX | IPOCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 1.67 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 1.67 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.624 | 22.814 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 690M | 74.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.33 | 0.13 | 2,655% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.43 | 14.61 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.61 | 47.11 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.00 | 27.18 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.25 | 93.33 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement