Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IPOCX vs RNWBX
IPOCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts IPOCX vs RNWBX
Macquarie Systematic Em Mkts Eq C
Price$18.38
Change+$0.24 (+1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets694.78M
American Funds New World R2
Price$91.90
Change+$1.11 (+1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.64B
IPOCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IPOCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPOCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.6B vs. IPOCX (695M). IPOCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: IPOCX (3.19) vs RNWBX (0.12). IPOCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: IPOCX (29 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). IPOCX (2.24) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. IPOCX (28.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than IPOCX: RNWBX (250) vs IPOCX (1000). IPOCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.43 vs. RNWBX (14.46). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 25.15 vs. IPOCX (-3.28).
| IPOCX | RNWBX | IPOCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 1.67 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 1.67 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.909 | 24.949 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 695M | 74.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.19 | 0.12 | 2,644% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.43 | 14.46 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.03 | 55.89 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.28 | 25.15 | -13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.36 | 85.47 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers