Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IPOCX vs RNWBX
IPOCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts IPOCX vs RNWBX
Macquarie Systematic Em Mkts Eq C
Price$16.98
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets686.11M
American Funds New World R2
Price$86.38
Change-$0.32 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.77B
IPOCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IPOCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPOCX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 71.8B vs. IPOCX (686M). IPOCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: IPOCX (3.37) vs RNWBX (0.13). IPOCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: IPOCX (29 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). IPOCX (2.26) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. IPOCX (28.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than IPOCX: RNWBX (250) vs IPOCX (1000). IPOCX (11.45) and RNWBX (11.39) have marching annual gain over last year. RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 17.80 vs. IPOCX (-8.74).
| IPOCX | RNWBX | IPOCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 1.67 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 1.67 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.180 | 17.444 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 686M | 71.8B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.37 | 0.13 | 2,612% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.45 | 11.39 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.71 | 36.75 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.74 | 17.80 | -49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.31 | 84.76 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement