Ad is loading...
IPOCX vs RNWHX
IPOCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts IPOCX vs RNWHX
Macquarie Systematic Em Mkts Eq C
Price$14.89
Change+$0.07 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets662.9M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$76.84
Change+$0.35 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.57B
IPOCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IPOCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPOCX is a Buy and RNWHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 62.6B vs. IPOCX (663M). IPOCX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: IPOCX (3.11) vs RNWHX (1.44). IPOCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: IPOCX (29 years) vs RNWHX (9 years). IPOCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. RNWHX (32.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than IPOCX: RNWHX (250) vs IPOCX (1000). IPOCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.98 vs. RNWHX (7.29). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 10.70 vs. IPOCX (-12.05).
| IPOCX | RNWHX | IPOCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.067 | 1.079 | 6% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 663M | 62.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.11 | 1.44 | 216% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.98 | 7.29 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | -27.05 | -3.12 | 868% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.05 | 10.70 | -113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.48 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...