Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IRCZX vs NTKLX
IRCZX vs NTKLX Comparison
Open Charts IRCZX vs NTKLX
IRCZX vs NTKLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IRCZX vs. NTKLX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IRCZX is a Hold and NTKLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IRCZX has more cash in the bank: 1.3B vs. NTKLX (591M). IRCZX pays higher dividends than NTKLX: IRCZX (2.10) vs NTKLX (1.30). IRCZX was incepted earlier than NTKLX: IRCZX (11 years) vs NTKLX (32 years). NTKLX (1.55) is less costly to investors than IRCZX (1.10). NTKLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. IRCZX (57.00). IRCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NTKLX: IRCZX (0) vs NTKLX (1000). NTKLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.24 vs. IRCZX (12.15). IRCZX return over 5 years is better than : 29.94 vs. NTKLX (27.70).
| IRCZX | NTKLX | IRCZX / NTKLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.53 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.55 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.233 | 12.116 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.3B | 591M | 220% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.10 | 1.30 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.15 | 21.24 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.87 | 64.69 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.94 | 27.70 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.22 | 109.93 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement