Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IRLAX vs RGABX
IRLAX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts IRLAX vs RGABX
IRLAX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IRLAX vs. RGABX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IRLAX is a Buy and RGABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. IRLAX (1.47B). IRLAX pays higher dividends than RGABX: IRLAX (0.02) vs RGABX (0.00). IRLAX was incepted earlier than RGABX: IRLAX (11 years) vs RGABX (24 years). RGABX (1.38) is less costly to investors than IRLAX (1.14). IRLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RGABX (32.00). IRLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGABX: IRLAX (0) vs RGABX (250). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.94 vs. IRLAX (-11.39). IRLAX return over 5 years is better than : 8.60 vs. RGABX (5.33).
| IRLAX | RGABX | IRLAX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.38 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.38 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.693 | 8.489 | -173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.47B | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.39 | -1.94 | 588% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.59 | 35.88 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.60 | 5.33 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 182.24 | 86.62 | 210% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers