Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IRLAX vs RGABX
IRLAX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts IRLAX vs RGABX
IRLAX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IRLAX vs. RGABX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IRLAX is a Hold and RGABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. IRLAX (1.68B). IRLAX pays higher dividends than RGABX: IRLAX (0.01) vs RGABX (0.00). IRLAX was incepted earlier than RGABX: IRLAX (11 years) vs RGABX (24 years). RGABX (1.38) is less costly to investors than IRLAX (1.14). IRLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RGABX (32.00). IRLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGABX: IRLAX (0) vs RGABX (250). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.79 vs. IRLAX (6.26). IRLAX return over 5 years is better than : 29.34 vs. RGABX (14.79).
| IRLAX | RGABX | IRLAX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.38 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.38 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.684 | 9.725 | -100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.68B | 338B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.26 | 11.79 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.38 | 45.45 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.34 | 14.79 | 198% |
| Returns for 10 years | 202.98 | 91.98 | 221% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement