Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IRLAX vs RGACX
IRLAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts IRLAX vs RGACX
IRLAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IRLAX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IRLAX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. IRLAX (1.68B). IRLAX pays higher dividends than RGACX: IRLAX (0.01) vs RGACX (0.00). IRLAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: IRLAX (11 years) vs RGACX (24 years). IRLAX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). IRLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). IRLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: IRLAX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.40 vs. IRLAX (6.26). IRLAX return over 5 years is better than : 29.34 vs. RGACX (20.76).
| IRLAX | RGACX | IRLAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.93 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.93 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.684 | 9.929 | -98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.68B | 338B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.26 | 13.40 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.38 | 50.58 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.34 | 20.76 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 202.98 | 107.11 | 190% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement