Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IRLCX vs RWMFX
IRLCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts IRLCX vs RWMFX
IRLCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IRLCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IRLCX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. IRLCX (1.07B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than IRLCX: RWMFX (1.40) vs IRLCX (1.27). IRLCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: IRLCX (18 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). IRLCX (0.87) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. IRLCX (11.00). IRLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: IRLCX (0) vs RWMFX (250). IRLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.11 vs. RWMFX (8.54). IRLCX return over 5 years is better than : 72.67 vs. RWMFX (30.09).
| IRLCX | RWMFX | IRLCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.31 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.31 | 281% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.355 | 2.080 | 209% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.07B | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 1.40 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.11 | 8.54 | 247% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.25 | 24.40 | 247% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.67 | 30.09 | 242% |
| Returns for 10 years | 245.27 | 80.41 | 305% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers