Advertisement
IRT vs REG
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Independence Realty Trust (IRT) vs. Regency Centers (REG) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Regency Centers (REG) outperforms Independence Realty Trust (IRT) on year-to-date (YTD) returns with 17.36% versus 8.63%.
- IRT provides a higher dividend yield of 4.31% compared to REG's 3.77%.
- Both are real estate investment trusts (REITs), but IRT focuses on multifamily residential properties while REG specializes in retail shopping centers.
- REG boasts a larger market capitalization ($15 billion versus $3.8 billion) and lower volatility (beta of 0.92 versus 1.01).
- Analyst price targets indicate potential upside for both, with IRT around $19 and REG near $83.
- Recent momentum favors REG, trading near its 52-week high amid retail sector resilience.
Introduction
Independence Realty Trust (IRT) and Regency Centers (REG) represent distinct segments within the REIT landscape: multifamily residential and retail properties, respectively. This comparison is relevant for investors seeking diversified real estate exposure, dividend income, or hedges against inflation in varying market conditions. Traders may find value in evaluating their relative performance amid interest rate fluctuations and sector-specific trends like rental demand and consumer spending. With both stocks showing resilience in recent market activity, understanding their business models, momentum, and risk profiles aids informed decision-making in today's dynamic environment.
IRT Overview and Recent Performance
Independence Realty Trust, Inc. (IRT) is a self-administered REIT that owns and operates multifamily apartment communities in non-gateway U.S. markets across the Southeast and Midwest, totaling about 33,000 units. In recent weeks, IRT shares have traded around $15.80, recovering from a 52-week low near $14.60 while remaining below the high of $19.83. Year-to-date gains stand at 8.63%, supported by a trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 65.79 and a market capitalization of $3.8 billion. Sentiment has been influenced by upcoming first-quarter 2026 earnings, a declared quarterly dividend, and analyst updates maintaining overweight ratings with targets near $19. Residential rental demand and operational improvements have driven performance, though high interest rates pose ongoing pressures.
REG Overview and Recent Performance
Regency Centers Corporation (REG) is a leading REIT owning and developing grocery-anchored neighborhood and community shopping centers nationwide. Shares recently hovered near $80, close to the 52-week high of $81.66 from a low of $66.86, reflecting YTD returns of 17.36% and a market cap of $15 billion. The trailing P/E ratio is 28.45, with a beta of 0.92 indicating lower volatility. Recent market activity benefits from strong fourth-quarter 2025 results, new developments in high-demand areas, and analyst affirmations like overweight ratings with targets up to $88. Resilient retail trends, particularly necessity-based leasing, have bolstered sentiment amid economic uncertainties.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates the top-performing AI trading bots from its library of 351 bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and sectors. Only the most suitable for current volatility and market conditions earn a spot among the 25 featured trending agents, showcasing annualized returns from +15% to +168%, win rates of 48% to 88%, profit factors up to 6.94, and drawdowns managed via take-profit/stop-loss corridors. These include signal agents for semiconductors like SOXL and NVDA portfolios, volatility plays on leveraged ETFs, and sector-specific bots for energy or gold miners. With varying styles from short-term scalping (5-minute charts) to trend-following, they offer real-time signals and risk management. Investors can explore these high performers to enhance strategies—visit Trending AI Robots for details.
Head-to-Head Comparison
IRT and REG diverge in business models: IRT's multifamily focus ties growth to apartment occupancy and rent growth in affordable markets, while REG leverages stable grocery-anchored retail with development pipelines. Recent momentum favors REG due to superior YTD gains and proximity to highs, contrasting IRT's recovery phase. Risk profiles differ, with IRT's higher beta exposing it more to rate hikes, versus REG's defensive retail exposure amid consumer spending steadiness. REG commands premium valuation via lower P/E but trails in yield; both benefit from REIT tax advantages yet face sector risks like housing supply for IRT and e-commerce for REG.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI models currently lean toward REG based on stronger trend consistency, lower volatility, robust YTD momentum, and positive retail catalysts like new developments. While IRT offers attractive yield and recovery potential, REG's relative positioning suggests higher probability of near-term outperformance in stable conditions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IRT is a Hold and REG is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IRT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileREG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- IRT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- REG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IRT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while REG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- IRT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- REG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
IRT (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а -3.50% price change this week, while REG (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -2.40% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was -0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.26%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.45%.
Reported Earning Dates
IRT is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
REG is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Media Conglomerates (-0.17% weekly)Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.
@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.02% weekly)A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.
| IRT | REG | IRT / REG | |
| Capitalization | 3.77B | 14.2B | 27% |
| EBITDA | 379M | 1.19B | 32% |
| Gain YTD | -7.360 | 14.229 | -52% |
| P/E Ratio | 80.05 | 26.58 | 301% |
| Revenue | 662M | 1.59B | 42% |
| Total Cash | 23.3M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 2.43B | 5.6B | 43% |
IRT | REG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 75 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 22 Undervalued | 60 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 89 | 37 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 79 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 73 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IRT's Valuation (22) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for REG (60). This means that IRT’s stock grew somewhat faster than REG’s over the last 12 months.
REG's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IRT (89). This means that REG’s stock grew somewhat faster than IRT’s over the last 12 months.
REG's SMR Rating (79) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as IRT (91). This means that REG’s stock grew similarly to IRT’s over the last 12 months.
REG's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as IRT (59). This means that REG’s stock grew similarly to IRT’s over the last 12 months.
REG's P/E Growth Rating (73) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as IRT (88). This means that REG’s stock grew similarly to IRT’s over the last 12 months.
| IRT | REG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 46% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 46% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 45% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 61% | 12 days ago 50% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 61% | 6 days ago 41% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 29% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GLIN | 47.93 | 1.12 | +2.39% |
| VanEck India Growth Ldrs ETF | |||
| CXSE | 39.68 | 0.16 | +0.40% |
| WisdomTree China ex-State-Owd Entpr ETF | |||
| EWC | 57.89 | 0.02 | +0.03% |
| iShares MSCI Canada ETF | |||
| TRBF | 49.30 | -0.10 | -0.20% |
| Angel Oak Total Return ETF | |||
| RSSY | 25.07 | -0.23 | -0.91% |
| Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Futures Yield ETF | |||
IRT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IRT has been closely correlated with CPT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IRT jumps, then CPT could also see price increases.
REG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, REG has been closely correlated with FRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if REG jumps, then FRT could also see price increases.