Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IRVAX vs RMEBX
IRVAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts IRVAX vs RMEBX
IRVAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IRVAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IRVAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. IRVAX (317M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than IRVAX: RMEBX (1.04) vs IRVAX (0.97). IRVAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: IRVAX (11 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). IRVAX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). IRVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). IRVAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: IRVAX (0) vs RMEBX (250). IRVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.14 vs. RMEBX (9.98). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 32.93 vs. IRVAX (25.10).
| IRVAX | RMEBX | IRVAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.07 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.07 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.840 | 5.801 | 170% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 317M | 115B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 1.04 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.14 | 9.98 | 242% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.42 | 34.14 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.10 | 32.93 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.12 | 89.84 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement