Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IRVAX vs RMFCX
IRVAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts IRVAX vs RMFCX
IRVAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IRVAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IRVAX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. IRVAX (325M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than IRVAX: RMFCX (1.19) vs IRVAX (0.97). IRVAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: IRVAX (11 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). IRVAX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). IRVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). IRVAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: IRVAX (0) vs RMFCX (250). IRVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.39 vs. RMFCX (9.24). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.66 vs. IRVAX (31.40).
| IRVAX | RMFCX | IRVAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.91 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.91 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.479 | 6.368 | 196% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 325M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 1.19 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.39 | 9.24 | 286% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.36 | 34.91 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.40 | 35.66 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.73 | 96.09 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement