Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IRVAX vs RMFCX
IRVAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts IRVAX vs RMFCX
IRVAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IRVAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IRVAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. IRVAX (328M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than IRVAX: RMFCX (1.16) vs IRVAX (0.95). IRVAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: IRVAX (11 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). IRVAX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). IRVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). IRVAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: IRVAX (0) vs RMFCX (250). IRVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.07 vs. RMFCX (8.88). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. IRVAX (32.08).
| IRVAX | RMFCX | IRVAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.91 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.91 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.709 | 9.137 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 1.16 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.07 | 8.88 | 282% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.07 | 34.84 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.08 | 37.23 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.73 | 91.06 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement