IRVRF
Price
$0.16
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
23.68M
NEM
Price
$52.36
Change
-$2.15 (-3.94%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
42B
40 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

IRVRF vs NEM

Header iconIRVRF vs NEM Comparison
Open Charts IRVRF vs NEMBanner chart's image
Irving Resources
Price$0.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$6K
Capitalization23.68M
Newmont
Price$52.36
Change-$2.15 (-3.94%)
Volume$13.37M
Capitalization42B
IRVRF vs NEM Comparison Chart
Loading...
NEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IRVRF vs. NEM commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IRVRF is a Hold and NEM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (IRVRF: $0.16 vs. NEM: $52.36)
Brand notoriety: IRVRF: Not notable vs. NEM: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IRVRF: 20% vs. NEM: 94%
Market capitalization -- IRVRF: $23.68M vs. NEM: $42B
IRVRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $23.68M. NEM’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IRVRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNEM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IRVRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NEM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NEM is a better buy in the long-term than IRVRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NEM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • NEM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

IRVRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +15.83% price change this week, while NEM (@Precious Metals) price change was -0.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

NEM is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+7.34% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NEM($42B) has a higher market cap than IRVRF($23.7M). NEM YTD gains are higher at: 42.175 vs. IRVRF (-11.201). NEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 320M vs. IRVRF (-2.03M). NEM has more cash in the bank: 3.03B vs. IRVRF (6.58M). IRVRF has less debt than NEM: IRVRF (180K) vs NEM (9.44B). NEM has higher revenues than IRVRF: NEM (11.8B) vs IRVRF (0).
IRVRFNEMIRVRF / NEM
Capitalization23.7M42B0%
EBITDA-2.03M320M-1%
Gain YTD-11.20142.175-27%
P/E RatioN/A36.25-
Revenue011.8B-
Total Cash6.58M3.03B0%
Total Debt180K9.44B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IRVRF vs NEM: Fundamental Ratings
IRVRF
NEM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
962
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9050
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8216
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10085
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
43n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IRVRF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NEM (93) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that IRVRF’s stock grew significantly faster than NEM’s over the last 12 months.

IRVRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NEM (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that IRVRF’s stock grew similarly to NEM’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's SMR Rating (50) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IRVRF (90) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than IRVRF’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's Price Growth Rating (16) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for IRVRF (82) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew significantly faster than IRVRF’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's P/E Growth Rating (85) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as IRVRF (100) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew similarly to IRVRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NEM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WALD2.450.08
+3.38%
Waldencast plc
UCB29.280.60
+2.09%
United Community Banks Inc
VIV10.26-0.04
-0.39%
Telefonica Brasil SA
STRS19.07-0.22
-1.14%
Stratus Properties
ASST5.76-1.15
-16.64%
Asset Entities Inc.

IRVRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IRVRF and KUYAF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IRVRF and KUYAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IRVRF
1D Price
Change %
IRVRF100%
-0.86%
KUYAF - IRVRF
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.51%
NEM - IRVRF
29%
Poorly correlated
-3.94%
USAU - IRVRF
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.22%
BTG - IRVRF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.61%
EXK - IRVRF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.32%
More