Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ISBAX vs RWMFX
ISBAX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts ISBAX vs RWMFX
ISBAX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ISBAX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ISBAX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. ISBAX (75.7M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than ISBAX: RWMFX (1.41) vs ISBAX (0.00). ISBAX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: ISBAX (25 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). ISBAX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). ISBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RWMFX (32.00). ISBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: ISBAX (0) vs RWMFX (250). ISBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.25 vs. RWMFX (2.09). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.39 vs. ISBAX (-24.27).
| ISBAX | RWMFX | ISBAX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.31 | 390% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.31 | 548% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.960 | 4.508 | -43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.7M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.41 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.25 | 2.09 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.60 | 30.24 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.27 | 27.39 | -89% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.89 | 82.36 | -25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers