Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ISBAX vs RWMFX
ISBAX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts ISBAX vs RWMFX
ISBAX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ISBAX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ISBAX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. ISBAX (78.4M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than ISBAX: RWMFX (1.40) vs ISBAX (0.10). ISBAX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: ISBAX (24 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). ISBAX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). ISBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). ISBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: ISBAX (0) vs RWMFX (250). ISBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.69 vs. RWMFX (8.10). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.71 vs. ISBAX (-20.81).
| ISBAX | RWMFX | ISBAX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.31 | 390% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.31 | 548% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.385 | 5.575 | 186% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 78.4M | 214B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.10 | 1.40 | 7% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.69 | 8.10 | 206% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.52 | 33.11 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.81 | 26.71 | -78% |
| Returns for 10 years | -18.02 | 85.42 | -21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement