Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ISCSX vs RWEBX
ISCSX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts ISCSX vs RWEBX
ISCSX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ISCSX vs. RWEBX commentary
Jun 30, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ISCSX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. ISCSX (75.2M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than ISCSX: RWEBX (0.75) vs ISCSX (0.27). ISCSX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: ISCSX (25 years) vs RWEBX (12 years). ISCSX (1.45) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). ISCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). ISCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: ISCSX (0) vs RWEBX (250). ISCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.88 vs. RWEBX (4.95). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 23.05 vs. ISCSX (-19.05).
| ISCSX | RWEBX | ISCSX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.06 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 1.06 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.597 | 1.778 | 371% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.2M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.27 | 0.75 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.88 | 4.95 | 179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.52 | 25.38 | 10% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.05 | 23.05 | -83% |
| Returns for 10 years | -10.48 | 71.84 | -15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement