Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ISOPX vs WCMLX
ISOPX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts ISOPX vs WCMLX
ISOPX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ISOPX vs. WCMLX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ISOPX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ISOPX has more cash in the bank: 205M vs. WCMLX (51.9M). ISOPX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . ISOPX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: ISOPX (18 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than ISOPX (1.61). ISOPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 129.00 vs. WCMLX (89.00). ISOPX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: ISOPX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.02 vs. ISOPX (15.82). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 3.16 vs. ISOPX (-3.11).
| ISOPX | WCMLX | ISOPX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.99 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 1.79 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.162 | 11.410 | 19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 205M | 51.9M | 395% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.82 | 17.02 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.74 | 32.50 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.11 | 3.16 | -98% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers