Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ISOPX vs WCMLX
ISOPX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts ISOPX vs WCMLX
ISOPX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ISOPX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ISOPX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ISOPX has more cash in the bank: 193M vs. WCMLX (47.2M). ISOPX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . ISOPX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: ISOPX (18 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than ISOPX (1.61). ISOPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 129.00 vs. WCMLX (89.00). ISOPX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: ISOPX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). ISOPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.90 vs. WCMLX (2.81). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -7.51 vs. ISOPX (-12.01).
| ISOPX | WCMLX | ISOPX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.99 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 1.79 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.096 | 3.852 | -80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 193M | 47.2M | 409% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.90 | 2.81 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.07 | 23.40 | 171% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.01 | -7.51 | 160% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.97 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement