Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ITCSX vs RLBFX
ITCSX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts ITCSX vs RLBFX
ITCSX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ITCSX vs. RLBFX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ITCSX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. ITCSX (6.97B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than ITCSX: RLBFX (2.05) vs ITCSX (1.51). ITCSX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: ITCSX (38 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). ITCSX (0.90) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). ITCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.00 vs. RLBFX (50.00). ITCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: ITCSX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.63 vs. ITCSX (-3.58). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.02 vs. ITCSX (-13.42).
| ITCSX | RLBFX | ITCSX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.30 | 300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.30 | 300% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.492 | 8.571 | -76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.97B | 288B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 2.05 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.58 | 11.63 | -31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.17 | 39.87 | 13% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.42 | 34.02 | -39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.52 | 86.24 | 17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement