| ITM | NEA | ITM / NEA | |
| Gain YTD | -0.983 | 0.424 | -232% |
| Net Assets | 2.14B | 3.39B | 63% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 1.41 | 13% |
| Turnover | 11.00 | 15.00 | 73% |
| Yield | 2.92 | 4.69 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| ITM | NEA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 33% | 1 day ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 35% | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 45% | 29 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 52% | 1 day ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 39% | 1 day ago 62% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ITM has been loosely correlated with NIQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ITM jumps, then NIQ could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that NEA and NIQ have been poorly correlated (+-5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NEA and NIQ's prices will move in lockstep.