| ITM | NEA | ITM / NEA | |
| Gain YTD | -0.538 | 2.107 | -26% |
| Net Assets | 2.13B | 3.36B | 63% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 1.41 | 13% |
| Turnover | 10.00 | 15.00 | 67% |
| Yield | 3.02 | 4.97 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| ITM | NEA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 45% | 7 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 10 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 36% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 76% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ITM has been loosely correlated with NIQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ITM jumps, then NIQ could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that NEA and NIQ have been poorly correlated (+-5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NEA and NIQ's prices will move in lockstep.