Advertisement
ITOC vs NEOG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ITOC is a Hold and NEOG is a StrongBuy.
| ITOC | NEOG | ITOC / NEOG | |
| Capitalization | 5.17M | 2.57B | 0% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 170M | - |
| Gain YTD | -27.971 | 68.526 | -41% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 865.00 | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 870M | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 186M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 794M | - |
NEOG | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 97 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 37 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ITOC | NEOG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 71% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ITOC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while NEOG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ITOC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NEOG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ITOC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NEOG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ITOC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
- NEOG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
ITOC (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -5.28% price change this week, while NEOG (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -0.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -5.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.66%.
Reported Earning Dates
NEOG is expected to report earnings on Oct 08, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical/Nursing Services (-5.01% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
Advertisement
ITOC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ITOC and PFSA have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ITOC and PFSA's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ITOC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITOC | 100% | -0.43% | ||
| PFSA - ITOC | 30% Poorly correlated | -2.80% | ||
| PEN - ITOC | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.02% | ||
| APYX - ITOC | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.35% | ||
| NEOG - ITOC | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.08% | ||
| MDAI - ITOC | 20% Poorly correlated | +2.56% | ||
More | ||||
NEOG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NEOG has been loosely correlated with RVTY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NEOG jumps, then RVTY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NEOG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEOG | 100% | +0.08% | ||
| RVTY - NEOG | 42% Loosely correlated | +2.79% | ||
| SHC - NEOG | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| QTRX - NEOG | 38% Loosely correlated | +2.40% | ||
| HBIO - NEOG | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.47% | ||
| ICUI - NEOG | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
More | ||||