Advertisement
IUSG vs LRCX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IUSG is a Hold and LRCX is a Buy.
LRCX | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 30 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 30 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| IUSG | LRCX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 8 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 74% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DRUP | 71.68 | 0.64 | +0.90% |
| GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) | |||
| EFAV | 91.29 | 0.59 | +0.65% |
| iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV) | |||
| MYCN | 23.23 | 0.07 | +0.32% |
| State Street My2034 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCN) | |||
| FTNJ | 8.22 | 0.02 | +0.24% |
| Franklin New Jersey Municipal Income ETF (FTNJ) | |||
| DXUV | 68.11 | 0.15 | +0.22% |
| Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV) | |||
IUSG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IUSG has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IUSG jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IUSG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IUSG | 100% | -1.18% | ||
| LRCX - IUSG | 76% Closely correlated | -2.71% | ||
| NVDA - IUSG | 75% Closely correlated | -2.94% | ||
| AMAT - IUSG | 74% Closely correlated | -2.13% | ||
| QCOM - IUSG | 68% Closely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| ENTG - IUSG | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.48% | ||
More | ||||
LRCX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRCX has been closely correlated with AMAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LRCX jumps, then AMAT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LRCX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRCX | 100% | -2.71% | ||
| AMAT - LRCX | 91% Closely correlated | -2.13% | ||
| KLAC - LRCX | 87% Closely correlated | -0.06% | ||
| ASML - LRCX | 85% Closely correlated | -1.95% | ||
| NVMI - LRCX | 85% Closely correlated | -6.14% | ||
| RMBS - LRCX | 80% Closely correlated | -2.70% | ||
More | ||||