Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IVGSX vs RMFCX
IVGSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts IVGSX vs RMFCX
IVGSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IVGSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IVGSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. IVGSX (174M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than IVGSX: RMFCX (1.15) vs IVGSX (0.80). IVGSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: IVGSX (33 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) and IVGSX (0.90) have similar cost to investors . RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. IVGSX (18.00). IVGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: IVGSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). IVGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.36 vs. RMFCX (9.09). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.08 vs. IVGSX (-8.07).
| IVGSX | RMFCX | IVGSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.91 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.91 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.245 | 9.496 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 174M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.15 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.36 | 9.09 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.33 | 33.16 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.07 | 37.08 | -22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.55 | 92.36 | 9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers