Mid-cap growth strategies have attracted sustained interest amid economic expansion and innovation-driven sectors. IVOG and MDYG compete directly by tracking the same S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index. Investors comparing these ETFs evaluate cost efficiency, liquidity, and issuer reputation when seeking diversified exposure to mid-sized U.S. companies with above-average earnings growth potential.
IVOG is a passively managed ETF issued by Vanguard that seeks to track the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index. The fund holds approximately 245 securities and employs full replication. Top holdings typically include companies such as Twilio Inc. (TWLO), Coherent Corp. (COHR), and Curtiss-Wright Corp. (CW). Sector weights concentrate in technology, industrials, and healthcare. The expense ratio stands at 0.10%. As a traditional index-tracking ETF, it rebalances periodically to match index constituents and weights.
MDYG is a passively managed ETF sponsored by State Street Global Advisors that also tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index. The portfolio contains roughly 243–248 holdings with a similar top-ten concentration. Leading positions often feature Twilio Inc. (TWLO), Carpenter Technology Corp., and Curtiss-Wright Corp. (CW). Sector exposure mirrors the benchmark, with emphasis on technology, industrials, and healthcare. The expense ratio is 0.15%. The fund uses a sampling or replication approach aligned with index methodology and periodic rebalancing.
The mid-cap growth segment benefits from secular trends in digital transformation, industrial automation, and healthcare innovation. Macroeconomic factors such as moderate economic growth, stable interest-rate expectations, and corporate earnings expansion support capital allocation to these companies. Regulatory developments in technology and potential shifts in trade policy represent ongoing considerations. Investors monitor sector rotation patterns and earnings cycles that influence relative performance within the mid-cap growth universe.
Over recent market cycles, both ETFs have delivered comparable returns driven by the shared underlying index. Differences arise primarily from expense ratios and minor tracking variations. IVOG’s lower cost structure may contribute to a slight edge in net performance over extended periods. Volatility profiles remain aligned given identical benchmarks, though liquidity differences can affect execution costs during periods of elevated market activity. Relative positioning favors cost-conscious investors toward IVOG while those prioritizing trading volume may lean toward MDYG.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to refine your ETF research.
Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic preference to IVOG. The lower expense ratio, combined with equivalent index exposure and high portfolio overlap, supports a slight edge in long-term cost efficiency and net return potential. Both ETFs exhibit strong diversification and sector momentum alignment, yet the cost differential tilts the balance toward IVOG for investors prioritizing structural efficiency within the mid-cap growth category.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| IVOG | MDYG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 81% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FQAL | 83.77 | 0.05 | +0.06% |
| Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) | |||
| RFG | 59.66 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| Invesco S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF (RFG) | |||
| RWLC | 38.67 | -0.02 | -0.06% |
| Rayliant Wilshire Nxtgen US Large Cap Equity ETF | |||
| HYBX | 29.11 | -0.09 | -0.33% |
| TCW High Yield Bond ETF (HYBX) | |||
| BFEW | 21.44 | -0.08 | -0.36% |
| FT Vest Laddered U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF (BFEW) | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDYG has been closely correlated with AVNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDYG jumps, then AVNT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDYG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDYG | 100% | -0.13% | ||
| AVNT - MDYG | 76% Closely correlated | -0.46% | ||
| TEX - MDYG | 76% Closely correlated | -2.73% | ||
| HWC - MDYG | 76% Closely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| NDSN - MDYG | 75% Closely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| SYNA - MDYG | 72% Closely correlated | -1.30% | ||
More | ||||