Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IVRS vs SMH
IVRS vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts IVRS vs SMH
iShares Future Metaverse Tec And Com ETF
Price$42.34
Change+$0.39 (+0.93%)
Volume$130
Net Assets8.39M
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$321.87
Change+$0.81 (+0.25%)
Volume$15.91K
Net Assets30.49B
IVRS vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IVRS vs. SMH commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IVRS is a Hold and SMH is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 30.5B vs. IVRS (8.39M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than IVRS: SMH (32.576) vs IVRS (26.380). IVRS was incepted earlier than SMH: IVRS (3 years) vs SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than IVRS (0.47). IVRS has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| IVRS | SMH | IVRS / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 26.380 | 32.576 | 81% |
| Net Assets | 8.39M | 30.5B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.35 | 134% |
| Turnover | 39.00 | 15.00 | 260% |
| Yield | 5.24 | 0.37 | 1,420% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IVRS | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 11 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TAGS | 23.45 | N/A | N/A |
| Teucrium Agricultural Fund | |||
| GVUS | 52.19 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs MktBt Russell LgCpValEqETF | |||
| FITE | 83.48 | -0.32 | -0.38% |
| SPDR® S&P Kensho Future Security ETF | |||
| CSQ | 19.15 | -0.12 | -0.62% |
| Calamos Strategic Total Return | |||
| IWMI | 48.11 | -0.30 | -0.62% |
| NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF | |||
IVRS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IVRS has been loosely correlated with ZM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IVRS jumps, then ZM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IVRS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IVRS | 100% | -0.01% | ||
| ZM - IVRS | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.18% | ||
| SNPS - IVRS | 63% Loosely correlated | +4.08% | ||
| SHOP - IVRS | 58% Loosely correlated | -3.61% | ||
| RBLX - IVRS | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| AMD - IVRS | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.24% | ||
More | ||||