Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IVRS vs SMH
IVRS vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts IVRS vs SMH
iShares Future Metaverse Tec And Com ETF
Price$35.03
Change-$0.39 (-1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.15M
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$252.99
Change+$1.69 (+0.67%)
Volume$4.18K
Net Assets23.6B
IVRS vs SMH Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IVRS vs. SMH commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IVRS is a Buy and SMH is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 23.6B vs. IVRS (7.15M). IVRS has a higher annual dividend yield than SMH: IVRS (6.699) vs SMH (3.770). IVRS was incepted earlier than SMH: IVRS (2 years) vs SMH (13 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than IVRS (0.47). IVRS has a higher turnover SMH (18.00) vs SMH (18.00).
| IVRS | SMH | IVRS / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 6.699 | 3.770 | 178% |
| Net Assets | 7.15M | 23.6B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.35 | 134% |
| Turnover | 51.00 | 18.00 | 283% |
| Yield | 6.23 | 0.45 | 1,394% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SMH | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IVRS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IVRS has been loosely correlated with ZM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IVRS jumps, then ZM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IVRS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IVRS | 100% | N/A | ||
| ZM - IVRS | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| SNPS - IVRS | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.90% | ||
| SHOP - IVRS | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.40% | ||
| RBLX - IVRS | 57% Loosely correlated | +3.44% | ||
| AMD - IVRS | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.44% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 90% Closely correlated | +1.25% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | +1.40% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | +0.67% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | +0.46% | ||
More | ||||