Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IVRS vs SMH
IVRS vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts IVRS vs SMH
iShares Future Metaverse Tec And Com ETF
Price$38.06
Change+$0.12 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.6M
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$290.80
Change+$5.48 (+1.92%)
Volume$9.89M
Net Assets27.22B
IVRS vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IVRS vs. SMH commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IVRS is a Buy and SMH is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 27.2B vs. IVRS (7.6M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than IVRS: SMH (20.081) vs IVRS (12.470). IVRS was incepted earlier than SMH: IVRS (2 years) vs SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than IVRS (0.47). IVRS has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| IVRS | SMH | IVRS / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 12.470 | 20.081 | 62% |
| Net Assets | 7.6M | 27.2B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.35 | 134% |
| Turnover | 39.00 | 15.00 | 260% |
| Yield | 5.81 | 0.38 | 1,512% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IVRS | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IVRS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IVRS has been loosely correlated with ZM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IVRS jumps, then ZM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IVRS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IVRS | 100% | N/A | ||
| ZM - IVRS | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| SNPS - IVRS | 63% Loosely correlated | +3.56% | ||
| SHOP - IVRS | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| RBLX - IVRS | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| AMD - IVRS | 57% Loosely correlated | +6.41% | ||
More | ||||