Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IVRS vs SMH
IVRS vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts IVRS vs SMH
IVRS vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Annualized Return+95%
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IVRS vs. SMH commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IVRS is a Hold and SMH is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 71.9B vs. IVRS (7.85M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than IVRS: SMH (72.149) vs IVRS (-10.755). IVRS was incepted earlier than SMH: IVRS (3 years) vs SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than IVRS (0.47). IVRS has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
| IVRS | SMH | IVRS / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | -10.755 | 72.149 | -15% |
| Net Assets | 7.85M | 71.9B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.35 | 134% |
| Turnover | 39.00 | 12.00 | 325% |
| Yield | 0.26 | 0.18 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IVRS | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Annualized Return+95%
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IVRS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IVRS has been loosely correlated with ZM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IVRS jumps, then ZM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IVRS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IVRS | 100% | N/A | ||
| ZM - IVRS | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.47% | ||
| SNPS - IVRS | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| SHOP - IVRS | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.02% | ||
| RBLX - IVRS | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| AMD - IVRS | 57% Loosely correlated | +4.73% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +1.72% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +1.18% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | +2.64% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | +5.55% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 80% Closely correlated | -1.89% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 80% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
More | ||||