Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IVW vs QTR
IVW vs QTR Comparison
Open Charts IVW vs QTR
IVW vs QTR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IVW vs. QTR commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IVW is a Hold and QTR is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IVW has more net assets: 73.8B vs. QTR (7.62M). IVW has a higher annual dividend yield than QTR: IVW (9.830) vs QTR (8.280). IVW was incepted earlier than QTR: IVW (26 years) vs QTR (5 years). IVW (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than QTR (0.25). IVW has a higher turnover QTR (6.24) vs QTR (6.24).
| IVW | QTR | IVW / QTR | |
| Gain YTD | 9.830 | 8.280 | 119% |
| Net Assets | 73.8B | 7.62M | 968,377% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.25 | 72% |
| Turnover | 22.00 | 6.24 | 353% |
| Yield | 0.37 | 0.33 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IVW | QTR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IVW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IVW has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IVW jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IVW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IVW | 100% | +1.44% | ||
| LRCX - IVW | 69% Closely correlated | -1.58% | ||
| RVTY - IVW | 68% Closely correlated | -0.90% | ||
| TSLA - IVW | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| TER - IVW | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| ETN - IVW | 60% Loosely correlated | +7.32% | ||
More | ||||
QTR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTR has been loosely correlated with SWKS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QTR jumps, then SWKS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QTR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTR | 100% | +0.35% | ||
| SWKS - QTR | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| ZM - QTR | 54% Loosely correlated | +4.06% | ||
| VRSN - QTR | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.20% | ||
| DOCU - QTR | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| OKTA - QTR | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.08% | ||
More | ||||