IWB
Price
$421.15
Change
-$1.22 (-0.29%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Net Assets
48.97B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SPY
Price
$766.89
Change
-$2.46 (-0.32%)
Updated
Aug 31, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
814.41B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IWB vs SPY

IWB vs SPY Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY)

Key Takeaways

  • iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) tracks the Russell 1000 Index and provides exposure to approximately 1,000 large- and mid-cap U.S. stocks, offering slightly broader diversification than the S&P 500.
  • SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) tracks the S&P 500 Index with around 500 holdings, emphasizing the largest U.S. companies and maintaining a lower expense ratio of approximately 0.09%.
  • Both ETFs are passively managed and exhibit high overlap in top holdings such as NVIDIA, Apple, and Microsoft, resulting in similar sector exposures dominated by information technology.
  • SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) benefits from superior liquidity as the most actively traded ETF, while iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) includes a modest allocation to mid-cap stocks.
  • Expense ratios favor SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) at 0.09% versus 0.15% for iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB), impacting long-term cost efficiency.
  • In recent market cycles, both have demonstrated comparable performance driven by large-cap growth trends, with structural differences influencing relative positioning during sector rotations.

Introduction

Investors seeking broad U.S. large-cap equity exposure often evaluate iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) due to their established track records and high correlation. These ETFs do not compete directly in every respect but offer alternative pathways to similar investor goals of market-beta returns. iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) captures a wider large- and mid-cap universe, while SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) concentrates on the most prominent 500 companies. In the current environment of concentrated market leadership and cost-conscious allocation, comparing their structural attributes helps clarify trade-offs in diversification, fees, and liquidity.

iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) Overview

iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) seeks to track the Russell 1000 Index, which measures the performance of large- and mid-capitalization segments of the U.S. equity market. The fund holds approximately 1,000 to 1,029 securities and employs a passive, market-capitalization-weighted strategy with quarterly rebalancing aligned to index reconstitutions. Top holdings typically include NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet, with information technology representing the largest sector allocation at around 35-36%. Additional exposure spans financials (approximately 12%), industrials, communication services, and consumer discretionary. The expense ratio stands at 0.15%. As an open-end fund issued by BlackRock, it provides full transparency and quarterly distributions.

SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) Overview

SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) aims to replicate the S&P 500 Index, focusing on 500 leading U.S. companies. It maintains roughly 504-505 holdings in a unit investment trust structure and follows a passive, market-cap-weighted approach with periodic rebalancing. Prominent positions mirror those in broader large-cap benchmarks, led by NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet. Information technology comprises approximately 37-38% of assets, followed by financials, communication services, and consumer discretionary. The expense ratio is 0.09%. Launched in 1993 by State Street, it offers exceptional liquidity and quarterly dividend distributions.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the U.S. large-cap equity space, heavily influenced by technology sector momentum, earnings growth among mega-cap leaders, and macroeconomic factors such as interest rate expectations and corporate capital spending. Capital flows into broad market ETFs remain robust amid ongoing digital transformation and artificial intelligence adoption. Regulatory developments around technology competition and potential shifts in trade policy represent ongoing considerations. Sector risks include valuation concentration in a handful of names and sensitivity to changes in growth versus value rotations across market cycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, both iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) have reflected broader equity market trends tied to technology earnings cycles and interest rate sentiment. SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) tends to exhibit marginally higher concentration in the largest constituents, potentially amplifying upside during periods of mega-cap outperformance. iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) incorporates a modest mid-cap component that can provide incremental diversification during rotations favoring smaller large-caps. Volatility profiles remain closely aligned, with differences emerging primarily from index construction rather than active management decisions. Relative positioning favors cost efficiency and liquidity for SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) in prolonged holding periods.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into ETFs like iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) can leverage this platform for enhanced analysis.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would likely favor SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) with moderate probability due to its lower expense ratio, unmatched liquidity, and tight tracking of the widely followed S&P 500 benchmark. While iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) offers marginally broader diversification through mid-cap inclusion, the cost and liquidity advantages of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) align with preferences for efficiency in core large-cap allocations across varied market environments.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IWB vs. SPY commentary
Sep 01, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWB is a StrongBuy and SPY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPY has more net assets: 814B vs. IWB (49B). SPY (13.421) and IWB (13.278) have matching annual dividend yield . IWB was incepted earlier than SPY: IWB (26 years) vs SPY (34 years). SPY (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than IWB (0.15). IWB (3.00) and SPY (3.00) have matching turnover.
IWBSPYIWB / SPY
Gain YTD13.27813.42199%
Net Assets49B814B6%
Total Expense Ratio0.150.09159%
Turnover3.003.00100%
Yield0.921.0192%
Fund Existence26 years34 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IWBSPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IWB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SPY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NPFI25.940.01
+0.04%
Nuveen Preferred and Income ETF
JMST50.950.01
+0.03%
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Inc ETF
QVAL62.02-0.06
-0.09%
Alpha Architect US Quantitative Val ETF
FLQS49.75-0.21
-0.42%
Franklin US Small Cap Mltfctr Idx ETF
BEEZ35.48-0.26
-0.72%
Honeytree U.S. Equity ETF

IWB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWB has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IWB jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IWB
1D Price
Change %
IWB100%
-0.29%
MSFT - IWB
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.68%
AVGO - IWB
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
AAPL - IWB
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.63%
AMZN - IWB
59%
Loosely correlated
+3.97%
META - IWB
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
More