IWB
Price
$406.01
Change
-$0.70 (-0.17%)
Updated
Jul 20 closing price
Net Assets
48.04B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SPY
Price
$747.90
Change
+$5.82 (+0.78%)
Updated
Jul 21, 12:27 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
784.56B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IWB vs SPY

IWB vs SPY Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 21, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY)

Key Takeaways

  • iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) provides exposure to approximately 1,000 large- and mid-capitalization U.S. equities via the Russell 1000 Index, offering broader diversification than the S&P 500-focused SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY).
  • Both ETFs follow passive, market-capitalization-weighted strategies with heavy allocations to technology and growth-oriented sectors, resulting in similar risk profiles dominated by large-cap names.
  • SPY maintains a lower expense ratio of 0.0945% compared to IWB’s 0.15%, which can contribute to modestly higher net returns over long holding periods.
  • Top holdings overlap significantly across both funds, including NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, and AMZN, underscoring shared sensitivity to technology earnings and market sentiment.
  • IWB incorporates additional mid-capitalization companies beyond the S&P 500 universe, potentially enhancing diversification while introducing marginally higher volatility in certain market cycles.
  • Both ETFs exhibit strong liquidity and are suitable for core equity allocations, with SPY benefiting from exceptional trading volume as one of the most established large-cap benchmarks.

Introduction

Investors seeking broad U.S. large-cap equity exposure frequently evaluate iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) as core portfolio holdings. These ETFs do not compete in entirely distinct categories but represent closely aligned passive strategies targeting overlapping segments of the U.S. equity market. IWB extends coverage to a larger universe that includes select mid-capitalization names, while SPY concentrates strictly on the S&P 500. The comparison remains relevant in the current environment of concentrated technology leadership and evolving sector rotations, helping investors align structural characteristics with portfolio objectives.

iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) Overview

The iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) seeks to track the investment results of the Russell 1000 Index, a market-capitalization-weighted benchmark comprising the largest 1,000 U.S. companies by float-adjusted market value. The fund holds approximately 1,000 securities and maintains a passive, fully replicated structure with periodic rebalancing to reflect index changes. Expense ratio stands at 0.15%. Top holdings as of recent data include NVDA (7.09%), AAPL (6.53%), MSFT (4.10%), and AMZN (3.44%). Sector allocations emphasize information technology (approximately 36.6%), followed by financial services, industrials, and consumer cyclical. The fund’s inclusion of mid-capitalization constituents distinguishes it from narrower large-cap benchmarks and supports broader diversification within the growth and value spectrum.

SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) Overview

The SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is designed to track the S&P 500 Index, a market-capitalization-weighted index of 500 leading U.S. large-capitalization companies selected for market size, liquidity, and industry representation. The ETF holds approximately 503–504 securities and employs a passive replication strategy with adjustments aligned to index reconstitutions. Its gross expense ratio is 0.0945%. Leading positions mirror market concentration, featuring NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, and AMZN among the largest weights. Sector breakdown shows pronounced exposure to information technology (approximately 38.2%), with meaningful allocations to financial services, communication services, and healthcare. SPY is recognized for exceptional liquidity and serves as a primary benchmark vehicle for institutional and retail investors.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The U.S. large-cap equity landscape continues to be shaped by technology sector dominance, artificial intelligence-driven capital expenditures, and robust corporate earnings growth among mega-cap companies. Macroeconomic factors including interest rate expectations, inflation trends, and geopolitical developments influence sector rotations between growth and value styles. Regulatory scrutiny on technology platforms and potential shifts in monetary policy remain key variables. Capital flows into broad market ETFs reflect ongoing investor preference for low-cost, diversified equity exposure amid uncertainty in smaller-capitalization segments.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, both ETFs have delivered returns closely aligned with large-cap benchmarks, with performance driven by earnings momentum in top technology holdings. IWB’s broader inclusion of mid-capitalization stocks has introduced modest differences in relative volatility and sector exposure during periods of style rotation. SPY’s tighter focus on the largest 500 companies has supported consistent participation in concentrated rallies while maintaining lower expense drag. Relative positioning favors SPY for investors prioritizing minimal costs and maximum liquidity, whereas IWB offers incremental diversification benefits within the large- and mid-cap universe.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to discover additional opportunities aligned with your strategy.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently favor SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) with moderate probability. The lower expense ratio, exceptional liquidity, and precise alignment with the widely followed S&P 500 benchmark support its positioning for core allocations. While IWB provides valuable additional diversification through mid-capitalization exposure, the cost efficiency and benchmark purity of SPY align more closely with prevailing investor preferences for streamlined large-cap exposure.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IWB vs. SPY commentary
Jul 21, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWB is a Hold and SPY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPY has more net assets: 785B vs. IWB (48B). SPY (9.402) and IWB (9.206) have matching annual dividend yield . IWB was incepted earlier than SPY: IWB (26 years) vs SPY (34 years). SPY (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than IWB (0.15). IWB (3.00) and SPY (3.00) have matching turnover.
IWBSPYIWB / SPY
Gain YTD9.2069.40298%
Net Assets48B785B6%
Total Expense Ratio0.150.09159%
Turnover3.003.00100%
Yield0.921.0191%
Fund Existence26 years34 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IWBSPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IWB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SPY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLBR22.110.14
+0.64%
Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF
COTG12.10N/A
N/A
Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF
MGOV20.01-0.05
-0.25%
First Trust Intermediate Gvt Opps ETF
SPMB22.08-0.06
-0.27%
State Street SPDR Port Mortg Bckd Bd ETF
TSSD28.44-0.09
-0.30%
Truth Social American Security & DfnsETF

IWB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWB has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IWB jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IWB
1D Price
Change %
IWB100%
-0.17%
MSFT - IWB
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.15%
AVGO - IWB
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.98%
AAPL - IWB
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.14%
AMZN - IWB
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.12%
META - IWB
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.02%
More