IWB
Price
$419.69
Change
+$1.79 (+0.43%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
48.91B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VOO
Price
$703.71
Change
+$2.70 (+0.39%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
1.69T
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IWB vs VOO

IWB vs VOO Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) vs. Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO)

Key Takeaways

  • iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) tracks the Russell 1000 Index and provides exposure to approximately 1,020 large- and mid-cap U.S. stocks, offering slightly broader diversification than the S&P 500.
  • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) tracks the S&P 500 Index with roughly 500 holdings, delivering concentrated exposure to the largest U.S. companies and maintaining a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.03% compared with 0.15% for IWB.
  • Both ETFs are passively managed and exhibit similar sector allocations, with heavy weighting toward technology, but VOO benefits from greater liquidity and tighter tracking to its benchmark.
  • Top holdings overlap substantially across both funds, including NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT, which drive performance in the current large-cap growth environment.
  • Structural differences in index construction lead to modest variations in volatility and sector exposure, with the Russell 1000 including a larger mid-cap component.
  • Cost efficiency and benchmark purity position VOO favorably for long-term core holdings, while IWB suits investors seeking marginally broader large-cap coverage.

Introduction

Investors frequently compare large-cap U.S. equity ETFs to optimize core portfolio exposure. IWB and VOO represent two prominent options in this category. They do not compete directly as identical products but offer alternative implementations of broad market-cap-weighted strategies targeting similar investor objectives of long-term growth and diversification within the U.S. equity market. Their relevance stems from ongoing sector rotation toward technology and the persistent dominance of mega-cap names in recent market cycles.

iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) Overview

The iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) is a passively managed fund that seeks to track the Russell 1000 Index. The index measures the performance of the largest 1,000 U.S. companies by market capitalization, encompassing both large- and mid-cap segments. The ETF holds approximately 1,020 securities and employs a representative sampling approach. Top holdings typically include NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN, and GOOGL. Sector allocations are led by technology, followed by financials and healthcare. The expense ratio stands at 0.15%. As an open-ended fund listed on NYSE Arca, it offers strong liquidity and quarterly rebalancing aligned with index changes.

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) Overview

The Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a passively managed fund designed to track the S&P 500 Index. This index comprises 500 leading U.S. companies selected for market size, liquidity, and sector representation. The ETF holds approximately 500 securities and uses full replication. Prominent holdings mirror those of IWB, led by NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN, and GOOGL. Technology dominates sector exposure, followed by financials and healthcare. The expense ratio is 0.03%. The fund is structured as an open-ended ETF with high liquidity on NYSE Arca and undergoes periodic rebalancing to maintain index alignment.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The U.S. large-cap equity market continues to be shaped by artificial intelligence adoption, robust corporate earnings in technology, and evolving interest-rate expectations. Capital flows remain concentrated in mega-cap growth names, supporting sector momentum in information technology. Regulatory developments around antitrust and data privacy introduce measured risks, while macroeconomic drivers such as inflation trends and labor-market data influence broader rotation. Both ETFs benefit from the current environment favoring scalable technology platforms, though differences in index breadth create subtle variations in sensitivity to mid-cap performance.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, both ETFs have delivered strong returns driven by earnings growth among top technology holdings. VOO has demonstrated tighter tracking to its benchmark with lower expense drag, contributing to modest outperformance in cost-sensitive periods. IWB provides marginally broader exposure that can enhance returns during mid-cap rallies but introduces slightly higher volatility. Relative positioning favors VOO for investors prioritizing benchmark fidelity and minimal costs, while IWB appeals in environments where incremental diversification across the Russell 1000 universe adds value.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to refine your ETF and equity analysis.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including structural strength, cost efficiency, diversification profile, and risk exposure, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favor to VOO. Its lower expense ratio and precise alignment with the widely followed S&P 500 benchmark support consistent positioning in the prevailing large-cap environment, while delivering comparable thematic exposure with reduced ongoing costs.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IWB vs. VOO commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWB is a Hold and VOO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VOO has more net assets: 1.69T vs. IWB (48.9B). IWB has a higher annual dividend yield than VOO: IWB (12.886) vs VOO (12.230). IWB was incepted earlier than VOO: IWB (26 years) vs VOO (16 years). VOO (0.03) has a lower expense ratio than IWB (0.15). IWB has a higher turnover VOO (2.00) vs VOO (2.00).
IWBVOOIWB / VOO
Gain YTD12.88612.230105%
Net Assets48.9B1.69T3%
Total Expense Ratio0.150.03500%
Turnover3.002.00150%
Yield0.921.0786%
Fund Existence26 years16 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IWBVOO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IWB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VOO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TECL194.810.68
+0.35%
Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X ETF
TSEC25.660.03
+0.12%
Touchstone Securitized Income ETF
MYHC25.070.02
+0.07%
State Street®My2029 HighYield CrptBdETF
DSU9.41-0.04
-0.42%
Blackrock Debt Strategies Fund
RIFR28.74-0.18
-0.63%
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure ETF

IWB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWB has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IWB jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IWB
1D Price
Change %
IWB100%
+0.43%
MSFT - IWB
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
AVGO - IWB
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
AAPL - IWB
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
AMZN - IWB
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
META - IWB
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
More