IWB
Price
$419.69
Change
+$1.79 (+0.43%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
48.91B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VTI
Price
$378.24
Change
+$1.66 (+0.44%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
2.29T
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IWB vs VTI

IWB vs VTI Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) vs. Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI)

Key Takeaways

  • iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) provides targeted exposure to approximately 1,000 large- and mid-cap U.S. stocks via the Russell 1000 Index, while Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) offers comprehensive coverage of the entire U.S. equity market through the CRSP U.S. Total Market Index.
  • Both ETFs follow passive indexing strategies with market-cap weighting and representative sampling or full replication methodologies, resulting in high overlap in top holdings such as technology leaders.
  • VTI features a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.03% compared to 0.15% for IWB, enhancing long-term cost efficiency for buy-and-hold investors.
  • IWB concentrates on large- and mid-cap segments with roughly 1,000 holdings, whereas VTI includes small-cap stocks for broader diversification across approximately 3,500 holdings.
  • Sector allocations for both are dominated by technology, with similar weightings in financials, healthcare, and industrials, though VTI incorporates additional small-cap exposure that can influence volatility profiles.
  • In recent market cycles, VTI’s wider diversification has supported relative stability during periods of small-cap outperformance, while IWB benefits from concentrated large-cap momentum.

Introduction

Investors seeking broad U.S. equity exposure frequently evaluate IWB and VTI as core portfolio holdings. These exchange-traded funds (ETFs) do not compete directly in identical segments but provide complementary strategies for similar goals of market participation. IWB emphasizes large- and mid-cap companies, while VTI captures the full market spectrum. The comparison remains relevant amid ongoing sector rotations and macroeconomic shifts that influence relative performance across market-capitalization tiers.

iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) Overview

The iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) seeks to track the Russell 1000 Index, a float-adjusted, market-cap-weighted benchmark of the largest approximately 1,000 U.S. companies by market capitalization. It holds roughly 1,000 securities and employs a representative sampling approach. Top holdings typically include NVIDIA Corp., Apple Inc., Microsoft Corp., Amazon.com Inc., and Alphabet Inc., with technology comprising the largest sector allocation. The expense ratio stands at 0.15%. As a passive, non-diversified fund, it rebalances periodically to maintain index alignment and offers high liquidity on the NYSE Arca exchange.

Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) Overview

The Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) aims to replicate the CRSP U.S. Total Market Index, encompassing nearly the entire investable U.S. equity universe. It contains approximately 3,500 holdings and uses full replication where feasible. Leading positions mirror those of large-cap peers, including NVIDIA Corp., Apple Inc., and Microsoft Corp., though small-cap inclusion broadens the profile. The expense ratio is 0.03%. This passive ETF rebalances to track the index and provides extensive diversification across market-capitalization segments on the NYSE Arca.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

U.S. equity markets continue to navigate artificial intelligence-driven innovation, interest-rate expectations, and sector rotation between growth and value segments. Technology remains a primary driver, supported by earnings momentum in semiconductor and software companies. Capital flows favor large-cap leaders, yet periodic small-cap rallies emerge during economic softening or policy shifts. Regulatory developments around antitrust and data privacy add uncertainty, while broader macroeconomic factors such as inflation trends and geopolitical tensions influence overall market volatility and sector allocations.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, IWB has exhibited performance closely tied to large-cap technology strength, delivering competitive returns during periods of concentrated mega-cap leadership. VTI has shown marginally different behavior due to its small-cap component, offering potential resilience when broader market participation expands. Volatility differences arise from VTI’s wider diversification, which can moderate drawdowns in certain rotations. Both ETFs reflect earnings cycles of overlapping top holdings, with positioning influenced by interest-rate expectations and commodity trends affecting industrials and energy sectors.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore opportunities with the AI Screener.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural characteristics, VTI presents a marginal edge in the current environment due to its lower expense ratio, broader diversification across market-capitalization tiers, and consistent trend alignment with the full U.S. equity market. While IWB offers efficient large- and mid-cap exposure, the cost efficiency and comprehensive coverage of VTI support a probabilistic preference for long-term positioning in diversified portfolios.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IWB vs. VTI commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWB is a Hold and VTI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTI has more net assets: 2.29T vs. IWB (48.9B). IWB (12.886) and VTI (12.860) have matching annual dividend yield . IWB was incepted earlier than VTI: IWB (26 years) vs VTI (25 years). VTI (0.03) has a lower expense ratio than IWB (0.15). IWB (3.00) and VTI (3.00) have matching turnover.
IWBVTIIWB / VTI
Gain YTD12.88612.860100%
Net Assets48.9B2.29T2%
Total Expense Ratio0.150.03500%
Turnover3.003.00100%
Yield0.921.0687%
Fund Existence26 years25 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IWBVTI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IWB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VTI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TECL194.810.68
+0.35%
Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X ETF
TSEC25.660.03
+0.12%
Touchstone Securitized Income ETF
MYHC25.070.02
+0.07%
State Street®My2029 HighYield CrptBdETF
DSU9.41-0.04
-0.42%
Blackrock Debt Strategies Fund
RIFR28.74-0.18
-0.63%
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure ETF

IWB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWB has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IWB jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IWB
1D Price
Change %
IWB100%
+0.43%
MSFT - IWB
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
AVGO - IWB
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
AAPL - IWB
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
AMZN - IWB
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
META - IWB
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
More