| IWD | LVDS | IWD / LVDS | |
| Gain YTD | 22.355 | 21.930 | 102% |
| Net Assets | 82.7B | 114M | 72,544% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.30 | 60% |
| Turnover | 14.00 | 19.00 | 74% |
| Yield | 1.36 | 1.28 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 24 years | - |
| IWD | LVDS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 40% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 86% | 10 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 43% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 79% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWD has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWD jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that LVDS and BAC have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LVDS and BAC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LVDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LVDS | 100% | +0.88% | ||
| BAC - LVDS | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.21% | ||
| WFC - LVDS | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.94% | ||
| AMZN - LVDS | 18% Poorly correlated | +1.94% | ||
| RTX - LVDS | 14% Poorly correlated | -0.22% | ||
| MSFT - LVDS | 12% Poorly correlated | +0.65% | ||
More | ||||