| IWD | MBOX | IWD / MBOX | |
| Gain YTD | 22.331 | 21.324 | 105% |
| Net Assets | 84.1B | 154M | 54,610% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.39 | 46% |
| Turnover | 14.00 | 40.00 | 35% |
| Yield | 1.36 | 1.81 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 5 years | - |
| IWD | MBOX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 82% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWD has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWD jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that MBOX and HPQ have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MBOX and HPQ's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MBOX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBOX | 100% | -1.28% | ||
| HPQ - MBOX | 24% Poorly correlated | -4.50% | ||
| WSO - MBOX | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.28% | ||
| MS - MBOX | 19% Poorly correlated | -0.68% | ||
| WSM - MBOX | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.18% | ||
| HPE - MBOX | 17% Poorly correlated | +7.75% | ||
More | ||||