| IWD | MBOX | IWD / MBOX | |
| Gain YTD | 23.882 | 23.497 | 102% |
| Net Assets | 83.9B | 154M | 54,481% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.39 | 46% |
| Turnover | 14.00 | 40.00 | 35% |
| Yield | 1.39 | 1.85 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 5 years | - |
| IWD | MBOX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 8 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 77% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWD has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWD jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that MBOX and HPQ have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MBOX and HPQ's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MBOX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBOX | 100% | +0.13% | ||
| HPQ - MBOX | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.07% | ||
| WSO - MBOX | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.91% | ||
| MS - MBOX | 18% Poorly correlated | -1.53% | ||
| WSM - MBOX | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.38% | ||
| DKS - MBOX | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.12% | ||
More | ||||