| IWD | MBOX | IWD / MBOX | |
| Gain YTD | 18.841 | 20.205 | 93% |
| Net Assets | 81B | 149M | 54,362% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.39 | 46% |
| Turnover | 14.00 | 40.00 | 35% |
| Yield | 1.44 | 1.92 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 5 years | - |
| IWD | MBOX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 57% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 76% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 76% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWD has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWD jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that MBOX and HPQ have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MBOX and HPQ's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MBOX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBOX | 100% | +1.03% | ||
| HPQ - MBOX | 19% Poorly correlated | +5.06% | ||
| AEM - MBOX | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.43% | ||
| GS - MBOX | 17% Poorly correlated | -1.26% | ||
| GRMN - MBOX | 16% Poorly correlated | +1.22% | ||
| MS - MBOX | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.33% | ||
More | ||||