Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWD vs PFM
IWD vs PFM Comparison
Open Charts IWD vs PFM
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
Price$203.04
Change+$3.10 (+1.55%)
Volume$7.16M
Net Assets64.43B
Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF
Price$50.48
Change+$0.48 (+0.96%)
Volume$32.16K
Net Assets719.96M
IWD vs PFM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWD vs. PFM commentary
Nov 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWD is a Hold and PFM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWD has more net assets: 64.4B vs. PFM (720M). PFM (11.338) and IWD (11.125) have matching annual dividend yield . IWD was incepted earlier than PFM: IWD (26 years) vs PFM (20 years). IWD (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than PFM (0.52). IWD has a higher turnover PFM (7.00) vs PFM (7.00).
| IWD | PFM | IWD / PFM | |
| Gain YTD | 11.125 | 11.338 | 98% |
| Net Assets | 64.4B | 720M | 8,944% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.52 | 35% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 7.00 | 214% |
| Yield | 1.72 | 1.42 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWD | PFM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 83% | 11 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 5 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWD has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWD jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
PFM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFM has been closely correlated with SEIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFM jumps, then SEIC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PFM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFM | 100% | +0.96% | ||
| SEIC - PFM | 82% Closely correlated | +1.55% | ||
| MCO - PFM | 80% Closely correlated | +1.28% | ||
| MET - PFM | 80% Closely correlated | +1.56% | ||
| PFG - PFM | 79% Closely correlated | +2.34% | ||
| TROW - PFM | 79% Closely correlated | +3.08% | ||
More | ||||