Ad is loading...
IWF vs LRCX
IWF vs LRCX Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs LRCX
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$395.18
Change-$1.49 (-0.38%)
Volume$13.64K
Net Assets104.49B
Lam Research
Price$75.08
Change+$0.63 (+0.85%)
Volume$142.49K
Capitalization127.38B
IWF vs LRCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. LRCX commentary
Jan 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Hold and LRCX is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LRCX: Fundamental Ratings
LRCX | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 47 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 21 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 20 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | LRCX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 81% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 89% | 7 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 74% | 7 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 81% | 7 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 89% | 9 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 79% | 7 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -0.35% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +1.49% | ||
More | ||||
LRCX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRCX has been closely correlated with AMAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 94% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LRCX jumps, then AMAT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LRCX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRCX | 100% | +0.82% | ||
| AMAT - LRCX | 94% Closely correlated | +1.63% | ||
| KLAC - LRCX | 91% Closely correlated | +1.49% | ||
| ASML - LRCX | 82% Closely correlated | +1.22% | ||
| VECO - LRCX | 82% Closely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| ONTO - LRCX | 81% Closely correlated | +5.89% | ||
More | ||||