Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs QCLR
IWF vs QCLR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. QCLR commentary
Jul 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Buy and QCLR is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 112B vs. QCLR (2.45M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than QCLR: IWF (6.690) vs QCLR (4.788). IWF was incepted earlier than QCLR: IWF (25 years) vs QCLR (4 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than QCLR (0.25). IWF has a higher turnover QCLR (9.99) vs QCLR (9.99).
| IWF | QCLR | IWF / QCLR | |
| Gain YTD | 6.690 | 4.788 | 140% |
| Net Assets | 112B | 2.45M | 4,563,977% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.25 | 76% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 9.99 | 120% |
| Yield | 0.42 | 0.49 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | QCLR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 49% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -0.27% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | +1.11% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
More | ||||
QCLR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QCLR has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QCLR jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QCLR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCLR | 100% | N/A | ||
| LRCX - QCLR | 77% Closely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| KLAC - QCLR | 75% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| AMAT - QCLR | 74% Closely correlated | +1.30% | ||
| CDNS - QCLR | 74% Closely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| ASML - QCLR | 73% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
More | ||||