Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs QCLR
IWF vs QCLR Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs QCLR
IWF vs QCLR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. QCLR commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Hold and QCLR is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 128B vs. QCLR (3.43M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than QCLR: IWF (3.213) vs QCLR (0.113). IWF was incepted earlier than QCLR: IWF (26 years) vs QCLR (5 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than QCLR (0.25). IWF has a higher turnover QCLR (7.94) vs QCLR (7.94).
| IWF | QCLR | IWF / QCLR | |
| Gain YTD | 3.213 | 0.113 | 2,852% |
| Net Assets | 128B | 3.43M | 3,737,226% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.25 | 72% |
| Turnover | 16.00 | 7.94 | 202% |
| Yield | 0.35 | 0.41 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | QCLR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 22 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 79% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -1.90% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -1.63% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -2.62% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +1.53% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -4.00% | ||
More | ||||
QCLR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QCLR has been loosely correlated with SWKS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QCLR jumps, then SWKS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QCLR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCLR | 100% | N/A | ||
| SWKS - QCLR | 59% Loosely correlated | -3.54% | ||
| ZM - QCLR | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.36% | ||
| DOCU - QCLR | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.40% | ||
| OKTA - QCLR | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| ALGN - QCLR | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.64% | ||
More | ||||