Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs QQH
IWF vs QQH Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs QQH
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$441.79
Change-$3.80 (-0.85%)
Volume$18.83K
Net Assets116.45B
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
Price$69.91
Change-$0.88 (-1.24%)
Volume$170
Net Assets615.43M
IWF vs QQH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. QQH commentary
Sep 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Hold and QQH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 116B vs. QQH (615M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than QQH: IWF (11.186) vs QQH (5.595). IWF was incepted earlier than QQH: IWF (25 years) vs QQH (6 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than QQH (1.02). QQH has a higher turnover IWF (13.00) vs IWF (13.00).
| IWF | QQH | IWF / QQH | |
| Gain YTD | 11.186 | 5.595 | 200% |
| Net Assets | 116B | 615M | 18,862% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 1.02 | 18% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 124.00 | 10% |
| Yield | 0.40 | 0.23 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | QQH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 73% | 5 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 87% | 6 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 79% | 13 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| KHYB | 24.30 | 0.02 | +0.08% |
| KraneShares Asia Pacific Hi Inc USD ETF | |||
| XCNY | 26.33 | N/A | N/A |
| SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF | |||
| GBF | 104.59 | -0.10 | -0.09% |
| iShares Government/Credit Bond ETF | |||
| FYC | 86.87 | -0.50 | -0.57% |
| First Trust Small Cap Gr AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
| SCHK | 31.17 | -0.18 | -0.57% |
| Schwab 1000 ETF | |||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -1.19% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -1.41% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -1.12% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -2.46% | ||
More | ||||
QQH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QQH has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QQH jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QQH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QQH | 100% | -1.68% | ||
| AMZN - QQH | 74% Closely correlated | -1.12% | ||
| NVDA - QQH | 72% Closely correlated | -3.32% | ||
| MSFT - QQH | 71% Closely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| AVGO - QQH | 70% Closely correlated | -3.65% | ||
| META - QQH | 69% Closely correlated | -1.65% | ||
More | ||||