Ad is loading...
IWF vs SCHG
IWF vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs SCHG
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$404.88
Change-$9.40 (-2.27%)
Volume$1.27M
Net Assets107.73B
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$28.01
Change-$0.72 (-2.51%)
Volume$11.07M
Net Assets39.61B
IWF vs SCHG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. SCHG commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a StrongBuy and SCHG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 108B vs. SCHG (39.6B). IWF (3.163) and SCHG (3.086) have matching annual dividend yield . IWF was incepted earlier than SCHG: IWF (25 years) vs SCHG (15 years). IWF has a higher turnover SCHG (9.00) vs SCHG (9.00).
| IWF | SCHG | IWF / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | 3.163 | 3.086 | 102% |
| Net Assets | 108B | 39.6B | 273% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 14.00 | 9.00 | 156% |
| Yield | 0.58 | 0.43 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 89% | 9 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 79% | 11 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -0.53% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -1.40% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -1.65% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | -0.62% | ||
| CDNS - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| SNPS - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | -1.40% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| AMZN - SCHG | 75% Closely correlated | -1.65% | ||
| KLAC - SCHG | 73% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
More | ||||