Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs SCHG
IWF vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs SCHG
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$420.09
Change-$4.49 (-1.06%)
Volume$18.48K
Net Assets110.99B
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$28.91
Change-$0.29 (-0.99%)
Volume$37.45K
Net Assets43.98B
IWF vs SCHG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. SCHG commentary
Jul 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Buy and SCHG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 111B vs. SCHG (44B). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHG: IWF (5.943) vs SCHG (5.019). IWF was incepted earlier than SCHG: IWF (25 years) vs SCHG (16 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than IWF (0.19). IWF has a higher turnover SCHG (3.00) vs SCHG (3.00).
| IWF | SCHG | IWF / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | 5.943 | 5.019 | 118% |
| Net Assets | 111B | 44B | 252% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.04 | 475% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 3.00 | 400% |
| Yield | 0.45 | 0.41 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 79% | 12 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.68% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +2.00% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -1.75% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.66% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | +0.65% | ||
| META - SCHG | 80% Closely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| CDNS - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| SNPS - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | +2.00% | ||
| LRCX - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
More | ||||